[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: ]RE: Ballot 194 - Effective Date of Ballot 193 Provisions is in the VOTING period (ends April 16)
sleevi at google.com
Tue Apr 18 20:42:36 UTC 2017
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:
> Am I understanding correctly that Google’s concern is that the ambiguity
> of whether this ballot had the proper majority required could result in a
> member with Essential Claims privately determining that the ballot did not
> pass, that the initiation of the Review period was therefore illegitimate,
> and therefore the license required by the IPR agreement does not apply?
Yes, both for this Ballot and, in applying the definition used here as
accepted precedent, for conducting future Ballots (and IP exclusions) in a
manner that would directly put members at risk.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Public