[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: ]RE: Ballot 194 - Effective Date of Ballot 193 Provisions is in the VOTING period (ends April 16)

philliph at comodo.com philliph at comodo.com
Tue Apr 18 21:04:06 UTC 2017

The best way to address future concerns would be to propose a ballot to fix them.

> On Apr 18, 2017, at 4:42 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <public at cabforum.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com <mailto:pzb at amzn.com>> wrote:
> Ryan,
> Am I understanding correctly that Google’s concern is that the ambiguity of whether this ballot had the proper majority required could result in a member with Essential Claims privately determining that the ballot did not pass, that the initiation of the Review period was therefore illegitimate, and therefore the license required by the IPR agreement does not apply?
> Yes, both for this Ballot and, in applying the definition used here as accepted precedent, for conducting future Ballots (and IP exclusions) in a manner that would directly put members at risk.
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170418/10f58aa3/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list