[cabfpub] Sunset for exceptions?

[Ryan Sleevi]

Ditto

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>
wrote:

> Yes. I'll support that
>
>
> Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:
>
> I received one late suggestion to also add a third item to the ballot to
> address one other exception.  This one is a little different as it removes
> the expiration of the exception rather than removing the exception.
>
> "3) Modify Section 5 of Appendix F of the EV Guidelines to replace the
> last sentence with the following sentence:
>
> When a Domain Name with “onion” as the right most label is included in a
> certificate that complies with this Appendix, the Domain Name shall not be
> considered an Internal Name."
>
> This removes the contingency on IESG action, as RFC 7686 was approved for
> publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG), has been
> published by the RFC Editor, and onion. has been added to the Special-Use
> Domain Names list by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority.
>
> Do at least three of members agree to include this in the ballot?
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 4:23 AM, Dean Coclin <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com> wrote:
>
> I think it will be 162 unless Ben has reserved that for one of the Policy
> ballots.
>
> Ben?
>
>
> Thanks
> Dean
>
> *From:* public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org
> <public-bounces at cabforum.org>] *On Behalf Of *Peter Bowen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 02, 2016 7:15 AM
> *To:* CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Sunset for exceptions?
>
> I think more than enough full members have agreed to propose and endorse:
> Richard Barnes of Mozilla
> Eddy Nigg of StartCom
> Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert
> Adriano Santoni of Actalis
> Ryan Sleevi of Google
>
> Can whoever doles out ballot numbers please assign a number and can the
> review period please be initiated?
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:27 PM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:
>
> How about this?
>
> Ballot XXX - Sunset of exceptions
>
> The following motion has been proposed by ______________ of _________ and
> endorsed by __________ of _________ and _________ of _________.
>
> -----BEGIN MOTION-----
>
> 1) Modify section 6.1.7 of the Baseline Requirements to add items 5(f) and
> 5(g) which read:
>
> f. The CA signs the Subscriber Certificate on or before June 30, 2016
>
> g. The notBefore field in the Subscriber Certificate has a date on or
> before June 30, 2016
>
> 2) Modify section 6.3.2 of the Baseline Requirements to replace the words
> "Beyond 1 April 2015" with the words "Until 30 June 2016"
>
> -----END MOTION-----
>
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Eddy Nigg <eddy_nigg at startcom.org> wrote:
>
> Dito.
>
> On 01/20/2016 01:25 AM, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
>
> I’m happy to make the motion or endorse removal of these exceptions.
>
> *From:* public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org
> <public-bounces at cabforum.org>] *On Behalf Of *Peter Bowen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:09 PM
> *To:* Ryan Sleevi
> *Cc:* CABFPub
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Sunset for exceptions?
>
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:
>
> The BRs contain at least two allowances for “legacy” certificate issuance:
>
> 6.1.7 (5) allows direct issuance of subscriber certificates from a root CA
>
> 6.3.2 allows certificates with validity periods longer than 39 months
>
> Are these still needed?  Are CAs relying upon these exceptions?  If not,
> does it make sense to ballot to remove these from the BRs?
>
>
> Peter, I'd be happy to support a ballot if you want to propose one. That
> tends to be the only way to get timely responses - the discussion period of
> the ballot.
>
>
> As an Associate Member, I cannot propose ballots.  Only those who have a
> full period-of-time audit can propose ballots.  Or at least that is my read
> of the bylaws.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Public mailing list
>
> Public at cabforum.org
>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Signer:
> Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
>
> StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org/>
> XMPP:
> startcom at startcom.org
> Blog:
> Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org/>
> Twitter:
> Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160203/f805f4e9/attachment-0003.html>