[cabfpub] Pre-Ballot - Removal of Insurance Requirements

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Sun Nov 30 21:35:10 UTC 2014

On Nov 30, 2014 9:14 PM, "Gervase Markham" <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:
> On 30/11/14 20:04, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> > mis-issued certs.  Just dropping insurance without doing something else
> > in compensation can make CAs look somewhat irresponsible.
> I think that's one of the points at issue; I don't think it makes CAs
> look irresponsible to drop an expensive requirement that doesn't help
> anyone. On the contrary, it makes them look like they are erecting
> barriers to entry to _not_ drop it.

Just a clarification, due to Gerv's mail client, the above was Kirk, not
myself. I absolutely agree with Gerv's sentiments here.

> > Given that this issue was presented as quite pressing on the prior
> > discussions, and especially after the failure of the previous ballot, it
> > would seem worthwhile to proceed and ballot Gerv's proposal as is,
> > rather than modify and seek new endorsers for some combined ballot.
> Yes, please proceed with my ballot.
> Gerv
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141130/2f870229/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list