[cabfpub] Pre-Ballot - Removal of Insurance Requirements

[Gervase Markham]

On 30/11/14 20:04, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> mis-issued certs.  Just dropping insurance without doing something else
> in compensation can make CAs look somewhat irresponsible.

I think that's one of the points at issue; I don't think it makes CAs
look irresponsible to drop an expensive requirement that doesn't help
anyone. On the contrary, it makes them look like they are erecting
barriers to entry to _not_ drop it.

> Given that this issue was presented as quite pressing on the prior
> discussions, and especially after the failure of the previous ballot, it
> would seem worthwhile to proceed and ballot Gerv's proposal as is,
> rather than modify and seek new endorsers for some combined ballot.

Yes, please proceed with my ballot.

Gerv