[cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)

kirk_hall at trendmicro.com kirk_hall at trendmicro.com
Thu Aug 8 16:01:06 UTC 2013

Trend Micro will switch to no, but would support a revised ballot.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 8:16 AM
To: ben at digicert.com
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)

On 30/07/13 16:59, Ben Wilson wrote:
> We could, but we might want to rewrite the paragraph and explain it more.

Mozilla votes NO - see below for why.

Looking at the discussion history for ballot 107, it was proposed, and then various people provided comments, but it has not been withdrawn or resubmitted, and voting ends tomorrow. (With one early vote from Trend Micro and one from GlobalSign being the only current outstanding votes).

I think consideration needs to be given to the feedback provided and so, to prevent it 'accidentally' passing when most people seem not to have voted, Mozilla votes NO. We are not against in principle, but we wish to see either a good explanation of why the proposed changes are not necessary, or the ballot being withdrawn and updated. If the former is provided before the deadline, we would certainly consider changing our vote.

Unfortunately, I am not able to be on the call today.

Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
<table class="TM_EMAIL_NOTICE"><tr><td><pre>
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.

More information about the Public mailing list