[cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)
ben at digicert.com
Thu Aug 8 18:41:15 UTC 2013
Without Kirk's endorsement and the other votes of concern let's consider the
ballot withdrawn for further editing.
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 9:16 AM
To: ben at digicert.com
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 107 - Removing version numbers to WebTrust
andETSI standards from CABF Guidelines (EVG and BR)
On 30/07/13 16:59, Ben Wilson wrote:
> We could, but we might want to rewrite the paragraph and explain it more.
Mozilla votes NO - see below for why.
Looking at the discussion history for ballot 107, it was proposed, and then
various people provided comments, but it has not been withdrawn or
resubmitted, and voting ends tomorrow. (With one early vote from Trend Micro
and one from GlobalSign being the only current outstanding votes).
I think consideration needs to be given to the feedback provided and so, to
prevent it 'accidentally' passing when most people seem not to have voted,
Mozilla votes NO. We are not against in principle, but we wish to see either
a good explanation of why the proposed changes are not necessary, or the
ballot being withdrawn and updated. If the former is provided before the
deadline, we would certainly consider changing our vote.
Unfortunately, I am not able to be on the call today.
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
More information about the Public