[cabfcert_policy] F2F Recap

[Ben Wilson]

Agreed.  I will prepare some ballots.  We have a call this morning, right?

 

From: Dean Coclin [mailto:Dean_Coclin at symantec.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 2:02 PM
To: Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com>; policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: RE: F2F Recap

 

Hi Ben,

Thanks for capturing these from the F2F. 

 

When can we have the ballots referenced below ready to go to the forum? I
think that should be the first step, although we can continue working the
3rd items in parallel.

 

Thanks

Dean

 

From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org
<mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org>
[mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 8:03 AM
To: policyreview at cabforum.org <mailto:policyreview at cabforum.org> 
Subject: [cabfcert_policy] F2F Recap

 

Today the working group discussed possible tasks and prioritization thereof:

*        Doing nothing/status quo was not considered a viable option.  

*        Converting the EV Guidelines into RFC 3647 and GitHub mark-down was
proposed.

*        Converting the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements
(NetSec) to RFC-3647 format and GitHub mark-down was also proposed.

*        Merging the NetSec into the Baseline Requirements (BRs), merging EV
into Baseline Requirements, and/or as appendices, etc., was also discussed.

*        Also, the Working Group asked for input into how its recent work
could be integrated into the BRs.

 

Here is what we decided:

*        A ballot will be introduced to convert the EV Guidelines into RFC
3647 and GitHub mark-down formats

*        A ballot will be introduced to convert the NetSec into RFC 3647 and
GitHub mark-down formats

*        The CP WG will prioritize amendments to the Baseline Requirements
and present them as subject-matter-related chunks 

*        Better communication is needed with auditors and their clients
about policy interpretations, requirements, etc. 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20151022/bc319889/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4954 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20151022/bc319889/attachment.bin