[cabfcert_policy] F2F Recap
Dean Coclin
Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Thu Oct 22 05:49:46 MST 2015
Yes we do. Thanks.
From: Ben Wilson [mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:49 AM
To: Dean Coclin; policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: RE: F2F Recap
Agreed. I will prepare some ballots. We have a call this morning, right?
From: Dean Coclin [mailto:Dean_Coclin at symantec.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 2:02 PM
To: Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com>; policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: RE: F2F Recap
Hi Ben,
Thanks for capturing these from the F2F.
When can we have the ballots referenced below ready to go to the forum? I
think that should be the first step, although we can continue working the
3rd items in parallel.
Thanks
Dean
From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org
[mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 8:03 AM
To: policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfcert_policy] F2F Recap
Today the working group discussed possible tasks and prioritization thereof:
. Doing nothing/status quo was not considered a viable option.
. Converting the EV Guidelines into RFC 3647 and GitHub mark-down was
proposed.
. Converting the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements
(NetSec) to RFC-3647 format and GitHub mark-down was also proposed.
. Merging the NetSec into the Baseline Requirements (BRs), merging EV
into Baseline Requirements, and/or as appendices, etc., was also discussed.
. Also, the Working Group asked for input into how its recent work
could be integrated into the BRs.
Here is what we decided:
. A ballot will be introduced to convert the EV Guidelines into RFC
3647 and GitHub mark-down formats
. A ballot will be introduced to convert the NetSec into RFC 3647 and
GitHub mark-down formats
. The CP WG will prioritize amendments to the Baseline Requirements
and present them as subject-matter-related chunks
. Better communication is needed with auditors and their clients
about policy interpretations, requirements, etc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20151022/5fe19cce/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5747 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20151022/5fe19cce/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Policyreview
mailing list