[cabfcert_policy] Next Step - Approach to CP v. 1.3.0

[Dean Coclin]

Yes, I think #2 is the best approach.

 

From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org
[mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 12:57 PM
To: policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfcert_policy] Next Step - Approach to CP v. 1.3.0

 

For a next step on our work, which option would y'all prefer?

 

1.      I create a copy of the BR-1.3-to-1.2 worksheet and indicate where I
think we should say "No Stipulation"?

2.      Take BR 1.3 and indicate in redline where I think we should say "No
Stipulation"?

3.      Something else

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150506/c6ab7764/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6130 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150506/c6ab7764/attachment-0001.bin