[cabfcert_policy] Next Step - Approach to CP v. 1.3.0

[Moudrick M. Dadashov]

Thanks for the great job, Ben, I believe ver 1.3 saves everybody a lot 
of time.

As the final product is BR x.y anyway, probably the option 2 would be 
more reasonable.

Thanks,
M.D.

On 5/6/2015 7:56 PM, Ben Wilson wrote:
>
> For a next step on our work, which option would y’all prefer?
>
> 1.I create a copy of the BR-1.3-to-1.2 worksheet and indicate where I 
> think we should say “No Stipulation”?
>
> 2.Take BR 1.3 and indicate in redline where I think we should say “No 
> Stipulation”?
>
> 3.Something else
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Policyreview mailing list
> Policyreview at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/policyreview

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150506/a2d94934/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3653 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150506/a2d94934/attachment.bin