[cabfcert_policy] Next Step - Approach to CP v. 1.3.0

[Ben Wilson]

Attached is a first stab - for discussion purposes.  

 

Here is a legend for the approach I took:

 

No stipulation = I don't think anyone cares about putting anything in this
section and it would be better if we didn't.

 

Not applicable = I can't see why would say anything in this section ever,
and if we did it would contradict the trust model that this CP defines.

 

Important = I feel it is important that we address it either immediately or
at some point in the not-too-distant future.

 

Potential = This section has the potential as a container of important,
relevant information concerning CA operations or the trust model.

 

NetSec = I copied back in the cross-references to the Network and
Certificate Systems Security Requirements that were removed when Ballot 146
went forward.

 

I took a quick pass, so I might have missed something or written in the
wrong assessment, so take a look.  We can go over this during our call at
1400 UTC tomorrow.  If you don't have the call-in information for CA/B Forum
Working Groups, please let me know.

 

 

 

From: policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org
[mailto:policyreview-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 10:57 AM
To: policyreview at cabforum.org
Subject: [cabfcert_policy] Next Step - Approach to CP v. 1.3.0

 

For a next step on our work, which option would y'all prefer?

 

1.      I create a copy of the BR-1.3-to-1.2 worksheet and indicate where I
think we should say "No Stipulation"?

2.      Take BR 1.3 and indicate in redline where I think we should say "No
Stipulation"?

3.      Something else

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150506/f0b12f0b/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CAB Forum BR 1.3.1-redlined.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 583680 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150506/f0b12f0b/attachment-0001.doc 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4954 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/policyreview/attachments/20150506/f0b12f0b/attachment-0001.bin