[Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31

[Ryan Sleevi]

Made edits and added screenshots. It looks like several steps had been
omitted from my previous mail, so hopefully that helps.

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:42 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <
dzacharo at harica.gr> wrote:

>
> I would appreciate a review of the last two sections added in
> https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide before removing the "under
> construction".
>
>
> Thank you,
> Dimitris.
>
>
> On 2020-07-20 9:32 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:
>
>
> I was out of office today so apologies for replying late. The result of
> the process is very good and I plan on adding specific instructions on
> https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide. Until we reach the next
> milestone of automatically creating a red-line, we can create a final
> version in the Pull Request, and compare against the existing main branch.
>
> I have attached the resulting docx redline BRs between 1.7.0 and ballots
> SC30+31 using the two docx versions I got from the links provided by Jos
> and Ryan.
>
> Does this look good to everyone? I will do a more detailed review myself
> tomorrow morning (Greek time) before posting to the public lists.
>
> Once again, a big thanks to Jos and Ryan for working on this automation.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Dimitris.
>
>
> On 2020-07-20 8:40 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>
> Dimitris: Did that work for you? I didn't hear back so wasn't sure if you
> were sorted now with https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:09 PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <
> dzacharo at harica.gr> wrote:
>
>> Thank you both for the quick response. I recall the instructions posted
>> by Ryan; unfortunately I am not so familiar with these processes. I will
>> read them more carefully during the weekend. In the meantime, if you
>> succeed in getting a combined SC30/SC31 docx against the BRs 1.7.0 sent by
>> Jos earlier today, that would save me a lot of time.
>>
>>
>> Dimitris.
>>
>>
>> On 17/7/2020 6:59 μ.μ., Jos Purvis (jopurvis) wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good, Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided is the official DOCX
>> from the official master branch: that’s the 1.7.0 version of the current
>> master-branch BRs. So that’s the current clean master version, against
>> which you can compare something from the ballot outputs to create a binary
>> redline. The trick is getting you something from the SC30/SC31 branches to
>> create that redline against. 😊 Ryan, I’ll have a look at it today when
>> I have a chance as well and see if I can sort it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com)
>> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> <sleevi at google.com>
>> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM
>> *To: *Dimitris Zacharopoulos <dzacharo at harica.gr> <dzacharo at harica.gr>
>> *Cc: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com> <jopurvis at cisco.com>,
>> "infrastructure at cabforum.org" <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>> <infrastructure at cabforum.org> <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30
>> and SC31
>>
>>
>>
>> https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html for
>> the instructions
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Let me dig out the previous e-mail from our discussions about this.
>>
>>
>>
>> The answer is "No, it won't work", and I was offering to get to it once
>> I'm nearer to a computer that can do that.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos <
>> dzacharo at harica.gr> wrote:
>>
>> That's fine.
>>
>> Do we have the artifacts from the current official master branch? I can
>> create a PR on our official repo, that contains the commits of both ballots
>> if that automatically creates new artifacts. Then, I can use MS word to
>> compare the display the changes, thus creating a redline.
>>
>> Would this work?
>>
>> DZ.
>>
>> Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com>:
>>
>> Hmmm. So I know we’ve never produced uploaded artifacts from PRs *from
>> other people’s forks*, which makes sense—I thought that was the
>> discussion. We’ve been producing artifacts from PRs of branches actually on
>> the cabforum repo, though, because a quick peruse of the S3 bucket contents
>> shows a folder for each cabforum/documents branch up through
>> pandoc-travis-changes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com)
>> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
>> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM
>> *To: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com>
>> *Cc: *"Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)" <dzacharo at harica.gr>, "
>> infrastructure at cabforum.org" <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30
>> and SC31
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <
>> jopurvis at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dimitris,
>>
>> For the current version in Word format, you can fetch it from this link:
>>
>> https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx
>>
>> That's the same link as the PDF from the front page of the CABF
>> repository, but with the extension changed to docx (we need to update the
>> README on the repository to reflect the new formats and whatnot!).
>>
>> For the SC30 and SC31 ballots, the Travis build completed successfully,
>> but it doesn't look like it uploaded the resulting artifacts to S3. Ryan,
>> is that something we need to fix? (Looks like that used to be the default
>> and isn't anymore?)
>>
>>
>>
>> I think there's some confusion. It was never the default to upload
>> artifacts for PRs. This is the whole discussion about the need to create a
>> dedicated branch within the main CABF repository, then create a PR using
>> that, to have the artifact produced. I'll see about doing that later today.
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infrastructure mailing listInfrastructure at cabforum.orghttps://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infrastructure mailing list
> Infrastructure at cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200721/e44ea760/attachment-0001.html>