[Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31

Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) dzacharo at harica.gr
Tue Jul 21 10:06:31 MST 2020



On 2020-07-21 7:27 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Made edits and added screenshots. It looks like several steps had been 
> omitted from my previous mail, so hopefully that helps.

It sure does. Some text is broken under step 8, probably because they 
are partially converted to hyperlinks.


Thanks,
Dimitris.



>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:42 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) 
> <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>
>
>     I would appreciate a review of the last two sections added in
>     https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide before removing the
>     "under construction".
>
>
>     Thank you,
>     Dimitris.
>
>
>     On 2020-07-20 9:32 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:
>>
>>     I was out of office today so apologies for replying late. The
>>     result of the process is very good and I plan on adding specific
>>     instructions on https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide.
>>     Until we reach the next milestone of automatically creating a
>>     red-line, we can create a final version in the Pull Request, and
>>     compare against the existing main branch.
>>
>>     I have attached the resulting docx redline BRs between 1.7.0 and
>>     ballots SC30+31 using the two docx versions I got from the links
>>     provided by Jos and Ryan.
>>
>>     Does this look good to everyone? I will do a more detailed review
>>     myself tomorrow morning (Greek time) before posting to the public
>>     lists.
>>
>>     Once again, a big thanks to Jos and Ryan for working on this
>>     automation.
>>
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>     Dimitris.
>>
>>
>>     On 2020-07-20 8:40 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>>>     Dimitris: Did that work for you? I didn't hear back so wasn't
>>>     sure if you were sorted now with
>>>     https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203
>>>
>>>     On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:09 PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
>>>     <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Thank you both for the quick response. I recall the
>>>         instructions posted by Ryan; unfortunately I am not so
>>>         familiar with these processes. I will read them more
>>>         carefully during the weekend. In the meantime, if you
>>>         succeed in getting a combined SC30/SC31 docx against the BRs
>>>         1.7.0 sent by Jos earlier today, that would save me a lot of
>>>         time.
>>>
>>>
>>>         Dimitris.
>>>
>>>
>>>         On 17/7/2020 6:59 μ.μ., Jos Purvis (jopurvis) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Sounds good, Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided is the
>>>>         official DOCX from the official master branch: that’s the
>>>>         1.7.0 version of the current master-branch BRs. So that’s
>>>>         the current clean master version, against which you can
>>>>         compare something from the ballot outputs to create a
>>>>         binary redline. The trick is getting you something from the
>>>>         SC30/SC31 branches to create that redline against. 😊Ryan,
>>>>         I’ll have a look at it today when I have a chance as well
>>>>         and see if I can sort it.
>>>>
>>>>         -- 
>>>>         Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
>>>>         .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>>>>         PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>>>>
>>>>         *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
>>>>         <mailto:sleevi at google.com>
>>>>         *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM
>>>>         *To: *Dimitris Zacharopoulos <dzacharo at harica.gr>
>>>>         <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>
>>>>         *Cc: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com>
>>>>         <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>, "infrastructure at cabforum.org"
>>>>         <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>>         <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>>         <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>>         *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review
>>>>         period for SC30 and SC31
>>>>
>>>>         https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html for
>>>>         the instructions
>>>>
>>>>         On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan Sleevi
>>>>         <sleevi at google.com <mailto:sleevi at google.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Let me dig out the previous e-mail from our discussions
>>>>             about this.
>>>>
>>>>             The answer is "No, it won't work", and I was offering
>>>>             to get to it once I'm nearer to a computer that can do
>>>>             that.
>>>>
>>>>             On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos
>>>>             <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 That's fine.
>>>>
>>>>                 Do we have the artifacts from the current official
>>>>                 master branch? I can create a PR on our official
>>>>                 repo, that contains the commits of both ballots if
>>>>                 that automatically creates new artifacts. Then, I
>>>>                 can use MS word to compare the display the changes,
>>>>                 thus creating a redline.
>>>>
>>>>                 Would this work?
>>>>
>>>>                 DZ.
>>>>
>>>>                 Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis (jopurvis)
>>>>                 <jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>:
>>>>
>>>>                     Hmmm. So I know we’ve never produced uploaded
>>>>                     artifacts from PRs /from other people’s forks/,
>>>>                     which makes sense—I thought that was the
>>>>                     discussion. We’ve been producing artifacts from
>>>>                     PRs of branches actually on the cabforum repo,
>>>>                     though, because a quick peruse of the S3 bucket
>>>>                     contents shows a folder for each
>>>>                     cabforum/documents branch up through
>>>>                     pandoc-travis-changes.
>>>>
>>>>                     -- 
>>>>                     Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>>                     <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
>>>>                     .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>>>>                     PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust
>>>>                     Verification
>>>>
>>>>                     *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com
>>>>                     <mailto:sleevi at google.com>>
>>>>                     *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM
>>>>                     *To: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)"
>>>>                     <jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>
>>>>                     *Cc: *"Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)"
>>>>                     <dzacharo at harica.gr
>>>>                     <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>>,
>>>>                     "infrastructure at cabforum.org
>>>>                     <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>"
>>>>                     <infrastructure at cabforum.org
>>>>                     <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>>
>>>>                     *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of
>>>>                     review period for SC30 and SC31
>>>>
>>>>                     On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos Purvis
>>>>                     (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>>                     <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                         Hi Dimitris,
>>>>
>>>>                         For the current version in Word format, you
>>>>                         can fetch it from this link:
>>>>                         https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx
>>>>
>>>>                         That's the same link as the PDF from the
>>>>                         front page of the CABF repository, but with
>>>>                         the extension changed to docx (we need to
>>>>                         update the README on the repository to
>>>>                         reflect the new formats and whatnot!).
>>>>
>>>>                         For the SC30 and SC31 ballots, the Travis
>>>>                         build completed successfully, but it
>>>>                         doesn't look like it uploaded the resulting
>>>>                         artifacts to S3. Ryan, is that something we
>>>>                         need to fix? (Looks like that used to be
>>>>                         the default and isn't anymore?)
>>>>
>>>>                     I think there's some confusion. It was never
>>>>                     the default to upload artifacts for PRs. This
>>>>                     is the whole discussion about the need to
>>>>                     create a dedicated branch within the main CABF
>>>>                     repository, then create a PR using that, to
>>>>                     have the artifact produced. I'll see about
>>>>                     doing that later today.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Infrastructure mailing list
>>     Infrastructure at cabforum.org  <mailto:Infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>     https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Infrastructure mailing list
>     Infrastructure at cabforum.org <mailto:Infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>     https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200721/fd8d1686/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Infrastructure mailing list