[Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
dzacharo at harica.gr
Tue Jul 21 10:06:31 MST 2020
On 2020-07-21 7:27 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Made edits and added screenshots. It looks like several steps had been
> omitted from my previous mail, so hopefully that helps.
It sure does. Some text is broken under step 8, probably because they
are partially converted to hyperlinks.
Thanks,
Dimitris.
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:42 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
> <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>
>
> I would appreciate a review of the last two sections added in
> https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide before removing the
> "under construction".
>
>
> Thank you,
> Dimitris.
>
>
> On 2020-07-20 9:32 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:
>>
>> I was out of office today so apologies for replying late. The
>> result of the process is very good and I plan on adding specific
>> instructions on https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide.
>> Until we reach the next milestone of automatically creating a
>> red-line, we can create a final version in the Pull Request, and
>> compare against the existing main branch.
>>
>> I have attached the resulting docx redline BRs between 1.7.0 and
>> ballots SC30+31 using the two docx versions I got from the links
>> provided by Jos and Ryan.
>>
>> Does this look good to everyone? I will do a more detailed review
>> myself tomorrow morning (Greek time) before posting to the public
>> lists.
>>
>> Once again, a big thanks to Jos and Ryan for working on this
>> automation.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dimitris.
>>
>>
>> On 2020-07-20 8:40 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>>> Dimitris: Did that work for you? I didn't hear back so wasn't
>>> sure if you were sorted now with
>>> https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:09 PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
>>> <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you both for the quick response. I recall the
>>> instructions posted by Ryan; unfortunately I am not so
>>> familiar with these processes. I will read them more
>>> carefully during the weekend. In the meantime, if you
>>> succeed in getting a combined SC30/SC31 docx against the BRs
>>> 1.7.0 sent by Jos earlier today, that would save me a lot of
>>> time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dimitris.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/7/2020 6:59 μ.μ., Jos Purvis (jopurvis) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good, Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided is the
>>>> official DOCX from the official master branch: that’s the
>>>> 1.7.0 version of the current master-branch BRs. So that’s
>>>> the current clean master version, against which you can
>>>> compare something from the ballot outputs to create a
>>>> binary redline. The trick is getting you something from the
>>>> SC30/SC31 branches to create that redline against. 😊Ryan,
>>>> I’ll have a look at it today when I have a chance as well
>>>> and see if I can sort it.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
>>>> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>>>> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
>>>> <mailto:sleevi at google.com>
>>>> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM
>>>> *To: *Dimitris Zacharopoulos <dzacharo at harica.gr>
>>>> <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>
>>>> *Cc: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com>
>>>> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>, "infrastructure at cabforum.org"
>>>> <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>> <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>> <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review
>>>> period for SC30 and SC31
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html for
>>>> the instructions
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan Sleevi
>>>> <sleevi at google.com <mailto:sleevi at google.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Let me dig out the previous e-mail from our discussions
>>>> about this.
>>>>
>>>> The answer is "No, it won't work", and I was offering
>>>> to get to it once I'm nearer to a computer that can do
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos
>>>> <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's fine.
>>>>
>>>> Do we have the artifacts from the current official
>>>> master branch? I can create a PR on our official
>>>> repo, that contains the commits of both ballots if
>>>> that automatically creates new artifacts. Then, I
>>>> can use MS word to compare the display the changes,
>>>> thus creating a redline.
>>>>
>>>> Would this work?
>>>>
>>>> DZ.
>>>>
>>>> Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis (jopurvis)
>>>> <jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>:
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm. So I know we’ve never produced uploaded
>>>> artifacts from PRs /from other people’s forks/,
>>>> which makes sense—I thought that was the
>>>> discussion. We’ve been producing artifacts from
>>>> PRs of branches actually on the cabforum repo,
>>>> though, because a quick peruse of the S3 bucket
>>>> contents shows a folder for each
>>>> cabforum/documents branch up through
>>>> pandoc-travis-changes.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
>>>> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>>>> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust
>>>> Verification
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com
>>>> <mailto:sleevi at google.com>>
>>>> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM
>>>> *To: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)"
>>>> <jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>
>>>> *Cc: *"Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)"
>>>> <dzacharo at harica.gr
>>>> <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>>,
>>>> "infrastructure at cabforum.org
>>>> <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>"
>>>> <infrastructure at cabforum.org
>>>> <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of
>>>> review period for SC30 and SC31
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos Purvis
>>>> (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com
>>>> <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dimitris,
>>>>
>>>> For the current version in Word format, you
>>>> can fetch it from this link:
>>>> https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx
>>>>
>>>> That's the same link as the PDF from the
>>>> front page of the CABF repository, but with
>>>> the extension changed to docx (we need to
>>>> update the README on the repository to
>>>> reflect the new formats and whatnot!).
>>>>
>>>> For the SC30 and SC31 ballots, the Travis
>>>> build completed successfully, but it
>>>> doesn't look like it uploaded the resulting
>>>> artifacts to S3. Ryan, is that something we
>>>> need to fix? (Looks like that used to be
>>>> the default and isn't anymore?)
>>>>
>>>> I think there's some confusion. It was never
>>>> the default to upload artifacts for PRs. This
>>>> is the whole discussion about the need to
>>>> create a dedicated branch within the main CABF
>>>> repository, then create a PR using that, to
>>>> have the artifact produced. I'll see about
>>>> doing that later today.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Infrastructure mailing list
>> Infrastructure at cabforum.org <mailto:Infrastructure at cabforum.org>
>> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infrastructure mailing list
> Infrastructure at cabforum.org <mailto:Infrastructure at cabforum.org>
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200721/fd8d1686/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Infrastructure
mailing list