<div dir="ltr">Made edits and added screenshots. It looks like several steps had been omitted from my previous mail, so hopefully that helps.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:42 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<br>
I would appreciate a review of the last two sections added in
<a href="https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide" target="_blank">https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide</a> before removing the
"under construction".<br>
<br>
<br>
Thank you,<br>
Dimitris.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 2020-07-20 9:32 μ.μ., Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<br>
I was out of office today so apologies for replying late. The
result of the process is very good and I plan on adding specific
instructions on <a href="https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide" target="_blank">https://wiki.cabforum.org/github_redline_guide</a>.
Until we reach the next milestone of automatically creating a
red-line, we can create a final version in the Pull Request, and
compare against the existing main branch.<br>
<br>
I have attached the resulting docx redline BRs between 1.7.0 and
ballots SC30+31 using the two docx versions I got from the links
provided by Jos and Ryan.<br>
<br>
Does this look good to everyone? I will do a more detailed review
myself tomorrow morning (Greek time) before posting to the public
lists.<br>
<br>
Once again, a big thanks to Jos and Ryan for working on this
automation.<br>
<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Dimitris.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 2020-07-20 8:40 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Dimitris: Did that work for you? I didn't hear
back so wasn't sure if you were sorted now with <a href="https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203" target="_blank">https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203</a></div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:09
PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div> Thank you both for the quick response. I recall the
instructions posted by Ryan; unfortunately I am not so
familiar with these processes. I will read them more
carefully during the weekend. In the meantime, if you
succeed in getting a combined SC30/SC31 docx against the
BRs 1.7.0 sent by Jos earlier today, that would save me a
lot of time.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dimitris.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 17/7/2020 6:59 μ.μ., Jos Purvis (jopurvis) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">Sounds good,
Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided is the
official DOCX from the official master branch:
that’s the 1.7.0 version of the current
master-branch BRs. So that’s the current clean
master version, against which you can compare
something from the ballot outputs to create a
binary redline. The trick is getting you something
from the SC30/SC31 branches to create that redline
against. </span><span style="font-family:"Apple Color Emoji"">😊</span><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> Ryan, I’ll have
a look at it today when I have a chance as well
and see if I can sort it. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">-- <br>
Jos Purvis (</span><a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:rgb(149,79,114)">jopurvis@cisco.com</span></a><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">)<br>
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services<br>
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust
Verification</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> </span></p>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Ryan Sleevi <a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank"><sleevi@google.com></a><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>Dimitris Zacharopoulos <a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank"><dzacharo@harica.gr></a><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank"><jopurvis@cisco.com></a>,
<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">"infrastructure@cabforum.org"</a>
<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank"><infrastructure@cabforum.org></a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Infrastructure]
Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html" target="_blank">https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html</a> for
the instructions</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48
AM Ryan Sleevi <<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank">sleevi@google.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Let me dig out the previous
e-mail from our discussions about this.</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The answer is "No, it
won't work", and I was offering to get to it
once I'm nearer to a computer that can do
that.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at
11:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">That's fine.<br>
<br>
Do we have the artifacts from the current
official master branch? I can create a PR
on our official repo, that contains the
commits of both ballots if that
automatically creates new artifacts. Then,
I can use MS word to compare the display
the changes, thus creating a redline.<br>
<br>
Would this work?<br>
<br>
</p>
<div>
<p>DZ. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis
(jopurvis) <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>>:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">Hmmm.
So I know we’ve never produced
uploaded artifacts from PRs <i>from
other people’s forks</i>, which
makes sense—I thought that was the
discussion. We’ve been producing
artifacts from PRs of branches
actually on the cabforum repo,
though, because a quick peruse of
the S3 bucket contents shows a
folder for each cabforum/documents
branch up through
pandoc-travis-changes. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">
</span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">-- <br>
Jos Purvis (</span><a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:rgb(149,79,114)">jopurvis@cisco.com</span></a><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">)<br>
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems
| Cryptographic Services<br>
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 |
Controls and Trust Verification</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">
</span></p>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Ryan
Sleevi <<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank">sleevi@google.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, July 17,
2020 at 11:07 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>"Jos Purvis
(jopurvis)" <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA)" <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">infrastructure@cabforum.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">infrastructure@cabforum.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re:
[Infrastructure] Preparation of
review period for SC30 and SC31
</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Jul
17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos
Purvis (jopurvis) <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi
Dimitris,<br>
<br>
For the current version in
Word format, you can fetch it
from this link:<br>
<a href="https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx" target="_blank">https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx</a><br>
<br>
That's the same link as the
PDF from the front page of the
CABF repository, but with the
extension changed to docx (we
need to update the README on
the repository to reflect the
new formats and whatnot!).<br>
<br>
For the SC30 and SC31 ballots,
the Travis build completed
successfully, but it doesn't
look like it uploaded the
resulting artifacts to S3.
Ryan, is that something we
need to fix? (Looks like that
used to be the default and
isn't anymore?)</p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I think
there's some confusion. It was
never the default to upload
artifacts for PRs. This is the
whole discussion about the
need to create a dedicated
branch within the main CABF
repository, then create a PR
using that, to have the
artifact produced. I'll see
about doing that later today. </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Infrastructure mailing list
<a href="mailto:Infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">Infrastructure@cabforum.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure" target="_blank">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Infrastructure mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">Infrastructure@cabforum.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</a><br>
</blockquote></div>