[Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31

[Ryan Sleevi]

Dimitris: Did that work for you? I didn't hear back so wasn't sure if you
were sorted now with https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:09 PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <
dzacharo at harica.gr> wrote:

> Thank you both for the quick response. I recall the instructions posted by
> Ryan; unfortunately I am not so familiar with these processes. I will read
> them more carefully during the weekend. In the meantime, if you succeed in
> getting a combined SC30/SC31 docx against the BRs 1.7.0 sent by Jos earlier
> today, that would save me a lot of time.
>
>
> Dimitris.
>
>
> On 17/7/2020 6:59 μ.μ., Jos Purvis (jopurvis) wrote:
>
> Sounds good, Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided is the official DOCX from
> the official master branch: that’s the 1.7.0 version of the current
> master-branch BRs. So that’s the current clean master version, against
> which you can compare something from the ballot outputs to create a binary
> redline. The trick is getting you something from the SC30/SC31 branches to
> create that redline against. 😊 Ryan, I’ll have a look at it today when I
> have a chance as well and see if I can sort it.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com)
> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> <sleevi at google.com>
> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM
> *To: *Dimitris Zacharopoulos <dzacharo at harica.gr> <dzacharo at harica.gr>
> *Cc: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com> <jopurvis at cisco.com>,
> "infrastructure at cabforum.org" <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
> <infrastructure at cabforum.org> <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and
> SC31
>
>
>
> https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html for
> the instructions
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:
>
> Let me dig out the previous e-mail from our discussions about this.
>
>
>
> The answer is "No, it won't work", and I was offering to get to it once
> I'm nearer to a computer that can do that.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos <
> dzacharo at harica.gr> wrote:
>
> That's fine.
>
> Do we have the artifacts from the current official master branch? I can
> create a PR on our official repo, that contains the commits of both ballots
> if that automatically creates new artifacts. Then, I can use MS word to
> compare the display the changes, thus creating a redline.
>
> Would this work?
>
> DZ.
>
> Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com>:
>
> Hmmm. So I know we’ve never produced uploaded artifacts from PRs *from
> other people’s forks*, which makes sense—I thought that was the
> discussion. We’ve been producing artifacts from PRs of branches actually on
> the cabforum repo, though, because a quick peruse of the S3 bucket contents
> shows a folder for each cabforum/documents branch up through
> pandoc-travis-changes.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com)
> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM
> *To: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com>
> *Cc: *"Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)" <dzacharo at harica.gr>, "
> infrastructure at cabforum.org" <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and
> SC31
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <jopurvis at cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Dimitris,
>
> For the current version in Word format, you can fetch it from this link:
>
> https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx
>
> That's the same link as the PDF from the front page of the CABF
> repository, but with the extension changed to docx (we need to update the
> README on the repository to reflect the new formats and whatnot!).
>
> For the SC30 and SC31 ballots, the Travis build completed successfully,
> but it doesn't look like it uploaded the resulting artifacts to S3. Ryan,
> is that something we need to fix? (Looks like that used to be the default
> and isn't anymore?)
>
>
>
> I think there's some confusion. It was never the default to upload
> artifacts for PRs. This is the whole discussion about the need to create a
> dedicated branch within the main CABF repository, then create a PR using
> that, to have the artifact produced. I'll see about doing that later today.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200720/908b01d0/attachment.html>