<div dir="ltr">Dimitris: Did that work for you? I didn't hear back so wasn't sure if you were sorted now with <a href="https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203">https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/203</a></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:09 PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
Thank you both for the quick response. I recall the instructions
posted by Ryan; unfortunately I am not so familiar with these
processes. I will read them more carefully during the weekend. In
the meantime, if you succeed in getting a combined SC30/SC31 docx
against the BRs 1.7.0 sent by Jos earlier today, that would save me
a lot of time.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dimitris.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 17/7/2020 6:59 μ.μ., Jos Purvis
(jopurvis) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">Sounds good,
Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided is the official DOCX
from the official master branch: that’s the 1.7.0 version of
the current master-branch BRs. So that’s the current clean
master version, against which you can compare something from
the ballot outputs to create a binary redline. The trick is
getting you something from the SC30/SC31 branches to create
that redline against. </span><span style="font-family:"Apple Color Emoji"">😊</span><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> Ryan, I’ll
have a look at it today when I have a chance as well and see
if I can sort it. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">-- <br>
Jos Purvis (</span><a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:rgb(149,79,114)">jopurvis@cisco.com</span></a><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">)<br>
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services<br>
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Ryan Sleevi
<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank"><sleevi@google.com></a><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>Dimitris Zacharopoulos
<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank"><dzacharo@harica.gr></a><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)"
<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank"><jopurvis@cisco.com></a>, <a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">"infrastructure@cabforum.org"</a>
<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank"><infrastructure@cabforum.org></a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of
review period for SC30 and SC31<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html" target="_blank">https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html</a> for
the instructions<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan
Sleevi <<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank">sleevi@google.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Let me dig out the previous e-mail
from our discussions about this.<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The answer is "No, it won't work",
and I was offering to get to it once I'm nearer to a
computer that can do that.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM
Dimitris Zacharopoulos <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>>
wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">That's
fine.<br>
<br>
Do we have the artifacts from the current official
master branch? I can create a PR on our official
repo, that contains the commits of both ballots if
that automatically creates new artifacts. Then, I
can use MS word to compare the display the changes,
thus creating a redline.<br>
<br>
Would this work?<br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p>DZ. <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>>:<u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">Hmmm. So I know we’ve
never produced uploaded artifacts from PRs <i>from
other people’s forks</i>, which makes
sense—I thought that was the discussion.
We’ve been producing artifacts from PRs of
branches actually on the cabforum repo,
though, because a quick peruse of the S3
bucket contents shows a folder for each
cabforum/documents branch up through
pandoc-travis-changes. </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">-- <br>
Jos Purvis (</span><a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:rgb(149,79,114)">jopurvis@cisco.com</span></a><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black">)<br>
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic
Services<br>
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and
Trust Verification</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Ryan
Sleevi <<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank">sleevi@google.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, July 17, 2020 at
11:07 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"Dimitris Zacharopoulos
(HARICA)" <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">infrastructure@cabforum.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">infrastructure@cabforum.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Infrastructure]
Preparation of review period for SC30 and
SC31 </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On
Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos Purvis
(jopurvis) <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>>
wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi
Dimitris,<br>
<br>
For the current version in Word format,
you can fetch it from this link:<br>
<a href="https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx" target="_blank">https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx</a><br>
<br>
That's the same link as the PDF from the
front page of the CABF repository, but
with the extension changed to docx (we
need to update the README on the
repository to reflect the new formats
and whatnot!).<br>
<br>
For the SC30 and SC31 ballots, the
Travis build completed successfully, but
it doesn't look like it uploaded the
resulting artifacts to S3. Ryan, is that
something we need to fix? (Looks like
that used to be the default and isn't
anymore?)<u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I
think there's some confusion. It was
never the default to upload artifacts
for PRs. This is the whole discussion
about the need to create a dedicated
branch within the main CABF repository,
then create a PR using that, to have the
artifact produced. I'll see about doing
that later today. <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>