[Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)]

Thank you both for the quick response. I recall the instructions posted 
by Ryan; unfortunately I am not so familiar with these processes. I will 
read them more carefully during the weekend. In the meantime, if you 
succeed in getting a combined SC30/SC31 docx against the BRs 1.7.0 sent 
by Jos earlier today, that would save me a lot of time.


Dimitris.


On 17/7/2020 6:59 μ.μ., Jos Purvis (jopurvis) wrote:
>
> Sounds good, Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided is the official DOCX 
> from the official master branch: that’s the 1.7.0 version of the 
> current master-branch BRs. So that’s the current clean master version, 
> against which you can compare something from the ballot outputs to 
> create a binary redline. The trick is getting you something from the 
> SC30/SC31 branches to create that redline against. 😊Ryan, I’ll have a 
> look at it today when I have a chance as well and see if I can sort it.
>
> -- 
> Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>
> *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com>
> *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM
> *To: *Dimitris Zacharopoulos <dzacharo at harica.gr>
> *Cc: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com>, 
> "infrastructure at cabforum.org" <infrastructure at cabforum.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 
> and SC31
>
> https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html for 
> the instructions
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com 
> <mailto:sleevi at google.com>> wrote:
>
>     Let me dig out the previous e-mail from our discussions about this.
>
>     The answer is "No, it won't work", and I was offering to get to it
>     once I'm nearer to a computer that can do that.
>
>     On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos
>     <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>> wrote:
>
>         That's fine.
>
>         Do we have the artifacts from the current official master
>         branch? I can create a PR on our official repo, that contains
>         the commits of both ballots if that automatically creates new
>         artifacts. Then, I can use MS word to compare the display the
>         changes, thus creating a redline.
>
>         Would this work?
>
>         DZ.
>
>         Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis (jopurvis)
>         <jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>:
>
>             Hmmm. So I know we’ve never produced uploaded artifacts
>             from PRs /from other people’s forks/, which makes sense—I
>             thought that was the discussion. We’ve been producing
>             artifacts from PRs of branches actually on the cabforum
>             repo, though, because a quick peruse of the S3 bucket
>             contents shows a folder for each cabforum/documents branch
>             up through pandoc-travis-changes.
>
>             -- 
>             Jos Purvis (jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>)
>             .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services
>             PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification
>
>             *From: *Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com
>             <mailto:sleevi at google.com>>
>             *Date: *Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM
>             *To: *"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis at cisco.com
>             <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>>
>             *Cc: *"Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)"
>             <dzacharo at harica.gr <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>>,
>             "infrastructure at cabforum.org
>             <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>"
>             <infrastructure at cabforum.org
>             <mailto:infrastructure at cabforum.org>>
>             *Subject: *Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review
>             period for SC30 and SC31
>
>             On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos Purvis (jopurvis)
>             <jopurvis at cisco.com <mailto:jopurvis at cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>                 Hi Dimitris,
>
>                 For the current version in Word format, you can fetch
>                 it from this link:
>                 https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx
>
>                 That's the same link as the PDF from the front page of
>                 the CABF repository, but with the extension changed to
>                 docx (we need to update the README on the repository
>                 to reflect the new formats and whatnot!).
>
>                 For the SC30 and SC31 ballots, the Travis build
>                 completed successfully, but it doesn't look like it
>                 uploaded the resulting artifacts to S3. Ryan, is that
>                 something we need to fix? (Looks like that used to be
>                 the default and isn't anymore?)
>
>             I think there's some confusion. It was never the default
>             to upload artifacts for PRs. This is the whole discussion
>             about the need to create a dedicated branch within the
>             main CABF repository, then create a PR using that, to have
>             the artifact produced. I'll see about doing that later today.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20200717/deaca613/attachment.html>