[cabf_validation] "Applicant" and "Applicant Representative" BR analysis items

[Corey Bonnell]

Hello,

Apologies for sending this out a bit late, but as promised on the previous
call, here's my running list of items we've identified thus far in our
reading of the BRs:

 

Things to keep in mind:

- Try to maintain current language/meaning of Subscriber Agreement/Terms of
Use to avoid messy legal changes

 

To discuss further:

- Do we need a term to encompass the concept of a current Subscriber that
has submitted a Certificate Request for a new Certificate?

 

To-do:

- Revive ballot to distinguish Secret vs. Freshness Random Values

- Make clear that CAs must maintain validation records for their own
Certificates

- Use same construction of the initial sentence in 3.2.3 as in 3.2.5 to
avoid requiring identity verification for DV certificates requested by
natural persons

- Move final sentence of 3.2.3 to 3.2.5, maybe make new sub-section to
clarify intent

- 4.1 and 4.2 need help, as it's not clear what exactly a "certificate
request" is comprised of

 

Thanks,

Corey

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20221025/d95c0e3e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4990 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/validation/attachments/20221025/d95c0e3e/attachment.p7s>