[Smcwg-public] [External Sender] Re: Draft proposal to add eIDAS QES as vetting evidence for individual

[Adriano Santoni]

Dimitris,

Il 16/05/2024 13:26, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Smcwg-public ha 
scritto:
> I think it is ok for the same CA to accept a signed (with an existing 
> S/MIME IV Certificate) request for renewal, coming from an existing 
> Subscriber, as long as the existing stored evidence can be re-used 
> according to the rules. 

Actually this is exactly what I had in mind: I was implicitly referring 
to an already existing S/MIME IV certificate issued by the /same/ CA 
from which the Applicant is requesting another one.

Adriano


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/smcwg-public/attachments/20240516/cb659c9f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4620 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/smcwg-public/attachments/20240516/cb659c9f/attachment.p7s>