[Smcwg-public] LEI clarification in Erratum ballot

Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) dzacharo at harica.gr
Mon Apr 24 14:19:00 UTC 2023



On 14/4/2023 9:41 μ.μ., Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> It was raised that the current language in 7.1.2.3 (i) could be 
> improved to make clear that the LEI “role” is not used in 
> Organization-validated certificate types.  This is a clarification 
> rather than a normative change.
>
> https://github.com/srdavidson/smime/commit/9966e8b1ad777df4cb1bf455482bb08e654243e6
>
> This has been added to the draft erratum ballot text.
>

Hi Stephe, Corey,

Doesn't this also apply for the Sponsor-validated profile? Under which 
section of the SMBRs do CAs validated the LEI Role?


Thanks,
Dimitris.

> Thanks @Corey Bonnell <mailto:Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com> for the 
> feedback.
>
> Regards, Stephen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Smcwg-public mailing list
> Smcwg-public at cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/smcwg-public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/smcwg-public/attachments/20230424/493dc254/attachment.html>


More information about the Smcwg-public mailing list