[Smcwg-public] LEI clarification in Erratum ballot
Stephen Davidson
Stephen.Davidson at digicert.com
Fri Apr 14 18:41:04 UTC 2023
Hello:
It was raised that the current language in 7.1.2.3 (i) could be improved to
make clear that the LEI "role" is not used in Organization-validated
certificate types. This is a clarification rather than a normative change.
https://github.com/srdavidson/smime/commit/9966e8b1ad777df4cb1bf455482bb08e6
54243e6
This has been added to the draft erratum ballot text.
Thanks <mailto:Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com> @Corey Bonnell for the feedback.
Regards, Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/smcwg-public/attachments/20230414/8f64679b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5263 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/smcwg-public/attachments/20230414/8f64679b/attachment.p7s>
More information about the Smcwg-public
mailing list