[Smcwg-public] rfc822Name and/or otherName of type id-on-SmtpUTF8Mailbox
Stephen Davidson
Stephen.Davidson at digicert.com
Mon Feb 14 16:18:30 UTC 2022
Hello:
In our discussions we have accommodated both the use of rfc822Name and the use of otherName of type id-on-SmtpUTF8Mailbox in public trust S/MIME.
I'd like to clarify something as it appears in several areas of the SMIME BR draft. For the SAN, which of the following is the most appropriate?
* Applicant information SHALL include, but not be limited to, at least one rfc822Name email address to be included in the Certificate's subjectAltName extension.
Or
* Applicant information SHALL include, but not be limited to, at least one rfc822Name or one otherName of type id-on-SmtpUTF8Mailbox to be included in the Certificate's subjectAltName extension.
In other words do we wish to define 1) a least one rfc822Name as required with an option for additional rfc822Names or id-on-SmtpUTF8Mailbox, or 2) at least one rfc822Name or id-on-SmtpUTF8Mailbox (interchangeably)?
Feedback welcomed!
Many thanks, Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/smcwg-public/attachments/20220214/42fa5732/attachment.html>
More information about the Smcwg-public
mailing list