[Smcwg-public] Individual identity verification: ETSI TS 119 460

Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) dzacharo at harica.gr
Fri Dec 17 12:16:51 UTC 2021


I believe the correct ETSI standard to point to is ETSI TS 119 461. 
https://www.etsi.org/standards-search#search=TS119461

460 was just the survey.

Dimitris.

On 17/12/2021 1:16 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Smcwg-public wrote:
>
> I think this ETSI Standard should be used, at least as a reference, 
> for all WGs and not only for S/MIME
>
> *De:* Smcwg-public <smcwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> *En nombre de 
> *Stephen Davidson via Smcwg-public
> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 8 de diciembre de 2021 18:30
> *Para:* SMIME Certificate Working Group <smcwg-public at cabforum.org>
> *Asunto:* [Smcwg-public] Individual identity verification: ETSI TS 119 460
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do 
> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender 
> and know the content is safe.
>
> Hello all:
>
> On the call, I mentioned that the WG must decide the appropriate 
> assurance level for S/MIME from an individual identity perspective, 
> which might include:
>
>   * Attributes to be verified
>   * Evidence/identity documentation allowed
>   * Identity proofing process
>
> Great volumes of existing standards are in place worldwide dealing 
> with this subject, covering different needs and nuances of 
> implementation.  Last year ETSI STF 588 worked to compile ETSI TS 119 
> 460 (Survey of technologies and regulatory requirements for identity 
> proofing for trust service subjects) which describes many of these 
> existing standards.  (This was used as input to the ETSI work to 
> define ETSI TS 119 461 which proposes policy and security requirements 
> for identity proofing).
>
> I pass this document on for your interest, and welcome feedback from 
> the WG on appropriate vetting measures for individual identity for S/MIME.
>
> https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/119400_119499/119460/01.01.01_60/tr_119460v010101p.pdf 
> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.etsi.org%2Fdeliver%2Fetsi_tr%2F119400_119499%2F119460%2F01.01.01_60%2Ftr_119460v010101p.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cinigo.barreira%40sectigo.com%7C20fe759c7f054c13704508d9ba7067d0%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C637745814898696857%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=eEwnG%2FUuodxD6ITfEHH9I3hdlq%2ByYCw6Vs0I8doo34o%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Best, Stephen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Smcwg-public mailing list
> Smcwg-public at cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/smcwg-public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/smcwg-public/attachments/20211217/ef7926d3/attachment.html>


More information about the Smcwg-public mailing list