[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-066: Fall 2023 Clean-up v3
Tobias S. Josefowitz
tobij at opera.com
Mon Nov 6 15:30:24 UTC 2023
Hi Inigo,
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023, Inigo Barreira wrote:
> Not sure what you are requesting, to not consider the issue #423 and
> remove the version number of the NetSec or that this change can´t be
> considered a "clean-up" ballot and should go on a different one. Or none
> of these ?
Both. Let me re-state my original points with all the possible clarity:
First, this seems to be a highly significant change relating to something
that has rightly been identified as sensitive around the formation of the
NetSec WG.
Second, since this is such a highly significant change, if it were to be
made, it should not be made in a "Clean-up" Ballot. (For what it is worth,
I do not think that this change should be made at all.)
> When the #423 was discussed, and Dimitris indicated in the proposal, was
> to remove the version numbers to avoid pointing to old or deprecated
> versions because everytime there was a new version of the NetSec, the
> TLS BRs should change/update and point to the new version. Dimitris
> indicated in the text that we could leave the version of the NetSec but
> I think that we agreed during the call to also remove that version
> number. Maybe someone else can clarify or remember what was agreed. If
> it was decided to keep the version number for the NetSec, this can be
> reverted.
I can understand that the significance of this change could easily be
missed during a Meeting situation. Luckily we have the opportunity in the
Ballot process to address such questions before a Ballot goes to vote.
Tobi
More information about the Servercert-wg
mailing list