[Servercert-wg] Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

[Corey Bonnell]

Hi Inigo,

I haven’t on Infra calls in several months (I have a standing meeting
conflict on Wednesdays, so I’m unable to attend) and I don’t see any GitHub
issue in the servercert repo regarding this issue, so I’m not sure what
problem currently exists regarding table formatting.

 

Do you have any pointer on what we’re looking to fix?

 

Thanks,

Corey

 

From: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.Barreira at sectigo.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 11:07 AM
To: Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell at digicert.com>; CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Subject: RE: Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

 

Corey, would it be possible to add to this “profiles cleanup ballot” what
was discussed the other day in the infra SC about the “-“ to format
correctly the tables generated in section 7?

 

De: Servercert-wg < <mailto:servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org>
servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> En nombre de Corey Bonnell via
Servercert-wg
Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de julio de 2023 16:17
Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <
<mailto:servercert-wg at cabforum.org> servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Draft ballot SC-XX: Profiles cleanup ballot

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.

 

Hello,

While adding support for SC-62 linting for TLS certificates in pkilint, a
few issues were identified with the current language in section 6 and 7 of
the BRs. To address these issues, I created a draft ballot on Github. The
draft ballot text can be viewed here:
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/SC63..CBonnell:servercert:sc6
2-cleanup
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
m%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fcompare%2FSC63..CBonnell%3Aservercert%3Asc62-cle
anup&data=05%7C01%7Cinigo.barreira%40sectigo.com%7C1d763755d99a470daf7908db8
862c446%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638253730006334573%7CUn
known%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJX
VCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Fg6vz%2FftZ0jk8L1wV81JX8r8bQzoKePrrjT1xr3
UNFI%3D&reserved=0> .

 

Chris Clements of the Chrome team reviewed and offered to endorse, so we’re
looking for one more endorser to push this ballot forward.

 

Please let me know if you have any feedback on the proposed language or if
you’d be willing to endorse.

 

Thanks,

Corey

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230719/5cb79439/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5257 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230719/5cb79439/attachment.p7s>