[Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot

[Backman, Antti]

Hi Inigo 

Would it be by any chance possible to create a PDF version of the new RFC based revision. As the old guideline format and RFC do not match very well structurally (by headers / sections) the markup document is pretty difficult to go through. 

I may be old-fashioned, but I would see beneficial even for the initial review to be able to visually see the guidelines in the RFC format as they would be in the published document at some point in the future, provided the ballot advances. 

//Antti 

This email may contain information which is privileged or protected against unauthorized disclosure or communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete this message and any attachments from your system without producing, distributing or retaining copies thereof or disclosing its contents to any other person. 

Telia Company processes emails and other files that may contain personal data in accordance with Telia Company’s Privacy Policy <https://www.teliacompany.com/en/about-the-company/privacy/>. 



Lähettäjä: Servercert-wg <servercert-wg-bounces at cabforum.org> edustaa käyttäjää Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Päivämäärä: maanantaina, 28. elokuuta 2023 klo 12.20
Vastaanottaja: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <servercert-wg at cabforum.org>
Aihe: [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot 

Hello, 
The current Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) are written in a non-standardized format. For many years it has been discussed to convert this document into the RFC 3647 format and follow the standardized model for this type of documents. 

Given that this has been known for several years, I have prepared the following ballot text, which converts the EVGs into the RFC 3647 format: 
EVGs based on RFC3647 by barrini · Pull Request #440 · cabforum/servercert (github.com) <https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/440> 

I am currently seeking two endorsers as well as any feedback on the ballot content itself (wording, effective dates, etc.). 

Thanks, 




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230828/46d7965a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 8486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20230828/46d7965a/attachment-0001.bin>