[Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins for Ballot SC48 v2: Domain Name and IP Address Encoding

Chema Lopez clopez at firmaprofesional.com
Thu Jul 22 06:44:40 UTC 2021


Firmaprofesional votes YES  on SC48 v2.



*Chema López*

Director Área Innovación, Cumplimiento y Tecnología

+34 666 429 224






*Barcelona  *Av. Torre Blanca 57, Edif. Esadecreapolis, Local 3B6 - 08173
Sant Cugat del Vallès | +34 934 774 245

*Madrid  *C/ Velázquez 59, 1º Ctro-Izda. - 28001 Madrid | +34 915 762 181


www.firmaprofesional.com



*El contenido de este correo electrónico y de sus anexos es confidencial.
Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, debe saber que está prohibido hacer
uso, divulgación y/o copia del mismo. En tal caso le agradeceríamos que
advierta de inmediato a su remitente y que proceda a destruir el mensaje.*



*Le informamos que, cumpliendo la normativa en materia de protección de
datos, FIRMAPROFESIONAL tratará sus datos con la finalidad de garantizar
las relaciones con la empresa, entidad u organización a la que usted
representa o en la que trabaja y por el período que dure dicha
relación. Podrá ejercer sus derechos de acceso, rectificación, supresión,
limitación, portabilidad y oposición al tratamiento ante el Responsable:
FIRMAPROFESIONAL, S.A., Av. Torre Blanca, 57, local 3B6 (Edificio
Esadecreapolis), 08173 Sant Cugat del Vallès (Barcelona), o bien mediante
correo electrónico a: rgpd at firmaprofesional.com
<rgpd at firmaprofesional.com>, en cualquier caso adjuntando una copia de su
D.N.I. o documento equivalente. Asimismo, podrá formular reclamaciones ante
la Agencia Española de Protección de Datos. Para más información puede
consultar nuestra política de privacidad
<https://www.firmaprofesional.com/esp/aviso-legal>.*


On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 17:00, Corey Bonnell via Servercert-wg <
servercert-wg at cabforum.org> wrote:

> This email begins the voting period for Ballot SC48 v2: Domain Name and IP
> Address Encoding.
>
>
> Purpose of Ballot
>
> Ballot 202 set out to clarify requirements regarding encoding of domain
> names and IP addresses in Subscriber Certificates, but the Ballot
> ultimately failed to pass. Since then, there have been numerous differences
> in interpretation of the written requirements.
>
>
>
> This Ballot seeks to resolve these differences in interpretation and to
> provide unambiguous guidance on the correct encoding of domain names and IP
> addresses in Subscriber Certificates.
>
>
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Corey Bonnell of DigiCert and
> endorsed by Ryan Sleevi of Google and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.
>
>
> Motion Begins
>
> This ballot modifies the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and
> Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates” (“Baseline Requirements”),
> based on Version 1.7.6:
>
> MODIFY the Baseline Requirements as specified in the following Redline:
>
>
> https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/cf4e17a43977dcf7cb9c9e41efd2df4be4707e13...e51b5cfbd1dfcf571523a4597c70a1395c508450
> <https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/cf4e17a43977dcf7cb9c9e41efd2df4be4707e13..e51b5cfbd1dfcf571523a4597c70a1395c508450>
>
>
>
> This ballot modifies the “Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of
> Extended Validation Certificates” (“EV Guidelines”) as follows, based on
> Version 1.7.6:
>
> MODIFY the EV Guidelines as defined in the following redline:
>
>
> https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/cf4e17a43977dcf7cb9c9e41efd2df4be4707e13...e51b5cfbd1dfcf571523a4597c70a1395c508450
> <https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/cf4e17a43977dcf7cb9c9e41efd2df4be4707e13..e51b5cfbd1dfcf571523a4597c70a1395c508450>
>
>
> Motion Ends
>
> This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline.
>
> The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
>
>
>
> Discussion (7+ days)
>
> Start Time: 2021-07-08 15:00:00 UTC
>
> End Time: 2021-07-15 15:00:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Vote for approval (7 days)
>
> Start Time: 2021-07-15 15:00:00 UTC
>
> End Time: 2021-07-22 15:00:00 UTC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Servercert-wg mailing list
> Servercert-wg at cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20210722/8b3e5b06/attachment.html>


More information about the Servercert-wg mailing list