[cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot

[Wayne Thayer]

Here is the proposed change:
https://github.com/cabforum/documents/commit/4866f8f85665cb308f6d5429ad64797e1e9e8d37

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:41 PM Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
wrote:

> Yes, sorry
>
>
>
> *From:* Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2019 2:36 PM
> *To:* Wayne Thayer <wthayer at mozilla.com>; Kirk Hall <
> Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
> *Cc:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]RE: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot
>
>
>
> Reversed, of course?  Since the IPR agreement uses letters and the goal
> was to be able to use numbered lists.
>
>
>
> 5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups
>
>
>
>    1. [Referred to as 5.3.1(a) in the IPR agreement]
>    Members who desire …
>    2. The charter shall …
>    3. …
>    4. …
>    5. [Referred to as 5.3.1(e) in the IPR agreement]
>    CWGs may …
>
>
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Wayne Thayer <wthayer at mozilla.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2019 1:58 PM
> *To:* Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
> *Cc:* Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public
> Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot
>
>
>
> I prefer Kirk's suggestion.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:39 PM Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
> wrote:
>
> Another option is to keep with the regular Bylaws numbering, and include a
> reference to IPRA in parenthesis:
>
>
>
> 5.3.1(a) [Referred to as 5.3.1(1) in IPR Agreement ]: Blah blah
>
>
>
> *From:* Public <public-bounces at cabforum.org> *On Behalf Of *Tim Hollebeek
> via Public
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2019 1:37 PM
> *To:* Wayne Thayer <wthayer at mozilla.com>
> *Cc:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot
>
>
>
> I like it.
>
>
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Wayne Thayer <wthayer at mozilla.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2019 11:22 AM
> *To:* Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
> *Cc:* Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <dzacharo at harica.gr>; CA/Browser
> Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot
>
>
>
> I'd like to propose an alternative that facilitates markdown formatting
> and the change to numbers in section 5.3.1: Add the following to the end of
> section 5.3.1:
>
>
>
> (a) To resolve references to section 5.3.1(a), refer to section 5.3.1(1).
>
>
>
> (e) To resolve references to section 5.3.1(e), refer to section 5.3.1(5).
>
>
>
> Would this be acceptable?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:30 AM Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
> wrote:
>
> I would suggest that this means we need to stick to letters for 5.3.1 for
> now, and remember to avoid making the same mistake in the future.
>
>
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20190425/09c10bb1/attachment-0003.html>