[cabfpub] Ballot SC5: Election of Server Certificate Working Group Vice Chair

[Wayne Thayer]

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:26 AM Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek at digicert.com>
wrote:

> This is correct.  The ballot requirements for endorsers and discussion
> periods applies to _*all*_ ballots.  The bylaws are pretty clear on that;
> it’s even in the title of section 2.3.
>
>
>
> The fact that 4.1(c) of the bylaws requires a ballot does not override the
> usual ballot rules.
>
>
>
> I really hate to nitpick about things like this, but I felt I had to point
> it out.
>
>
>
> Also if we could get a second endorser to fix the voting rules after
> Ballot 216 got accidentally overwritten, that’d be great.  I can write up
> the ballot over the weekend.
>
>
> My understanding is that Ben is working on a bylaws fixup ballot,
including the addition of the discussion period improvements from ballot
206. Regardless of who creates that ballot, I would be happy to endorse.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180907/228a360c/attachment-0003.html>