[cabfpub] Draft Agenda for CA/Browser Teleconference of Jan. 25, 2018 at 11 am Eastern

[Ryan Sleevi]

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:

> On 26/01/18 16:22, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> > It's very important to note here - until the Chair has performed their
> > duty, the Balloted documents are Draft Guidelines - and are not Final
> > Guidelines or Final Maintenance Guidelines.
>
> Well, section 2.4(h) is carefully and intentionally worded such that the
> Chair reports the "automatic" approval of the vote, rather than enabling
> it. So that section is not an issue. This was discussed at the time we
> redrafted this section, with the possibility of a chair not fulfilling
> their duties being the exact concern which motivated this wording.
>
> However you are right that if the Review Periods were not validly
> started, then they cannot have validly ended, and it seems the Review
> Periods require the full text to be made available in order to be
> validly initiated :-(
>
> > Let us now look to the Baseline Requirements [4]. As of time of this
> > e-mail, the Website lists the "Current Version" as BR 1.5.1, adopted in
> > Ballot 197. It lists versions 1.5.2 [5], 1.5.3 [6], and 1.5.4 [7] as
> > pending IPR review, the results of Ballots 190 [8], 214 [9], and 215
> > [10] respectively.
>
> But I don't think this mislabelling has a bylaw-legal effect in itself.
>

This mislabeling does have an issue with respect to 2.2 of the Baseline
Requirements, and CAs obligations therein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180126/44d26828/attachment-0003.html>