[cabfpub] Ballot proposal - Update Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria
Moudrick M. Dadashov
md at ssc.lt
Sun Apr 15 07:53:18 UTC 2018
We endorse this but what do you mean by "a national scheme"?
Thanks,
M.D.
On 4/15/2018 9:18 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public wrote:
>
> I am looking for two endorsers for the following ballot.
>
> Dimitris.
>
> *Ballot XXX - Update Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria*
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of
> HARICA and endorsed by ___ and ___
>
> *Background*:
>
> Section 8.4 of the Baseline Requirements describes the audit criteria
> for CAs that issue Publicly-Trusted SSL/TLS Certificates. This ballot
> attempts to achieve two things:
>
> 1. Remove the old ETSI TS documents
> 2.
>
> Align the WebTrust <https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust> and
> ETSI requirements
>
> "WebTrust <https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust> for Certification
> Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 401" and "WebTrust
> <https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust> Principles and Criteria for
> Certification Authorities – SSL Baseline with Network Security" is the
> equivalent of "ETSI EN 319 411-1".
>
> *-- MOTION BEGINS --*
>
> Replace the first two numbered items in section 8.4 of the Baseline
> Requirements from:
>
> 1.
>
> WebTrust <https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust> for
> Certification Authorities v2.0;
>
> 2. A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042 /
> ETSI EN 319 411-1; or
>
> to:
>
> 1.
>
> WebTrust <https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust> Principles and
> Criteria for Certification Authorities – SSL Baseline with Network
> Security;
>
> 2. A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI EN 319 411-1; or
>
> *-- MOTION ENDS --*
>
> The procedure for this ballot is as follows (exact start and end times
> may be adjusted to comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
>
> BALLOT XXX Status: Update BR Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria
>
>
>
> Start time (22:00 UTC)
>
>
>
> End time (22:00 UTC)
>
> Discussion (7+ days)
>
>
>
> TBD (hopefully 23 April 2018)
>
>
>
> TBD
>
> Vote for approval (7 days)
>
>
>
> TBD
>
>
>
> TBD according to voting start time
>
> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice)
> (30 days)
> If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to
> be created.
> If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of
> Review Period.
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the
> Public Mail List.
>
>
>
> Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
>
>
> 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
> From the Bylaws section 2.4(a): "If the Draft Guideline Ballot is
> proposing a Final Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a
> redline or comparison showing the set of changes from the Final
> Guideline section(s) intended to become a Final Maintenance Guideline,
> and need not include a copy of the full set of guidelines. Such
> redline or comparison shall be made against the Final Guideline
> section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need
> not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed
> subsequently, except as provided in Section 2.4(j) below".
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the
> Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes'
> in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the
> response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the
> response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote
> received from any representative of a voting member before the close
> of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here:
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes
> cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes
> cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is
> shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under the Bylaws section 2.3(g), at
> least the required quorum number must participate in the ballot for
> the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or
> abstaining.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20180415/838eef75/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Public
mailing list