<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
We endorse this but what do you mean by "a national scheme"?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
M.D.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/15/2018 9:18 AM, Dimitris
Zacharopoulos via Public wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0b087c1a-d0c0-fe6e-8a73-728614dd1995@it.auth.gr">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<br>
I am looking for two endorsers for the following ballot.<br>
<br>
Dimitris.<br>
<br>
<p class="line867"><strong>Ballot XXX - Update Section 8.4 for CA
audit criteria</strong> <span class="anchor" id="line-3"></span><span
class="anchor" id="line-4"></span></p>
<p class="line874">The following motion has been proposed by
Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and endorsed by ___ and ___<span
class="anchor" id="line-5"></span></p>
<p class="line867"><strong>Background</strong>: <span
class="anchor" id="line-7"></span><span class="anchor"
id="line-8"></span></p>
<p class="line874">Section 8.4 of the Baseline Requirements
describes the audit criteria for CAs that issue Publicly-Trusted
SSL/TLS Certificates. This ballot attempts to achieve two
things: <span class="anchor" id="line-9"></span><span
class="anchor" id="line-10"></span></p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Remove the old ETSI TS documents <span class="anchor"
id="line-11"></span></li>
<li>
<p class="line862">Align the <a class="nonexistent"
href="https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust"
moz-do-not-send="true">WebTrust</a> and ETSI requirements
<span class="anchor" id="line-12"></span><span
class="anchor" id="line-13"></span><span class="anchor"
id="line-14"></span></p>
</li>
</ol>
<p class="line862">"<a class="nonexistent"
href="https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust"
moz-do-not-send="true">WebTrust</a> for Certification
Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 401" and "<a
class="nonexistent"
href="https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust"
moz-do-not-send="true">WebTrust</a> Principles and Criteria
for Certification Authorities – SSL Baseline with Network
Security" is the equivalent of "ETSI EN 319 411-1". <span
class="anchor" id="line-15"></span><span class="anchor"
id="line-16"></span></p>
<p class="line867"><strong>-- MOTION BEGINS --</strong> <span
class="anchor" id="line-17"></span><span class="anchor"
id="line-18"></span></p>
<p class="line874">Replace the first two numbered items in section
8.4 of the Baseline Requirements <span class="anchor"
id="line-19"></span>from: <span class="anchor" id="line-20"></span><span
class="anchor" id="line-21"></span></p>
<ol type="1">
<li>
<p class="line891"><a class="nonexistent"
href="https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust"
moz-do-not-send="true">WebTrust</a> for Certification
Authorities v2.0; <span class="anchor" id="line-22"></span></p>
</li>
<li>A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042
/ ETSI EN 319 411-1; or <span class="anchor" id="line-23"></span><span
class="anchor" id="line-24"></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="line874">to: <span class="anchor" id="line-25"></span><span
class="anchor" id="line-26"></span></p>
<ol type="1">
<li>
<p class="line891"><a class="nonexistent"
href="https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/WebTrust"
moz-do-not-send="true">WebTrust</a> Principles and
Criteria for Certification Authorities – SSL Baseline with
Network Security; <span class="anchor" id="line-27"></span></p>
</li>
<li>A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI EN 319
411-1; or <span class="anchor" id="line-28"></span><span
class="anchor" id="line-29"></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="line867"><strong>-- MOTION ENDS --</strong> <span
class="anchor" id="line-30"></span><span class="anchor"
id="line-31"></span></p>
<p class="line874">The procedure for this ballot is as follows
(exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with
applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement): <span class="anchor"
id="line-32"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-33"></span></p>
<div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color: "#E0E0FF"">
<p class="line862">BALLOT XXX Status: Update BR Section
8.4 for CA audit criteria </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color:
"#E0E0FF"; text-align: center">
<p class="line862"> Start time (22:00 UTC) </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color:
"#E0E0FF"; text-align: center">
<p class="line862"> End time (22:00 UTC) </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="anchor" id="line-34"></span>
<p class="line862"> Discussion (7+ days) </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center">
<p class="line862"> TBD (hopefully 23 April 2018) </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center">
<p class="line862">TBD</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="anchor" id="line-35"></span>
<p class="line862"> Vote for approval (7 days) </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center">
<p class="line862"> TBD </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center">
<p class="line862"> TBD according to voting start time </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="" text-align: left; ""><span
class="anchor" id="line-36"></span>
<p class="line862">If vote approves ballot: Review
Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30 days)<br>
If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is
rescinded and PAG to be created.<br>
If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes
effective at end of Review Period.<br>
Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this
thread on the Public Mail List.</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center">
<p class="line862">Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center">
<p class="line862">30 days after filing of Review Notice
by Chair</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<span class="anchor" id="line-37"></span><span class="anchor"
id="line-38"></span>
<p class="line874">From the Bylaws section 2.4(a): "If the Draft
Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final Maintenance Guideline,
such ballot will include a redline or comparison showing the set
of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended <span
class="anchor" id="line-39"></span>to become a Final
Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full
set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made
against the Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time
a ballot is proposed, and need not take into consideration other
ballots that may be proposed subsequently, except as provided in
Section 2.4(j) below". <span class="anchor" id="line-40"></span><span
class="anchor" id="line-41"></span></p>
<p class="line862">Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply
to this thread on the Public list. A vote in favor of the motion
must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must
indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must
indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses
will not be counted. The latest vote received from any
representative of a voting member before the close of the voting
period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: <a
class="https" href="https://cabforum.org/members/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://cabforum.org/members/</a> <span
class="anchor" id="line-42"></span><span class="anchor"
id="line-43"></span></p>
In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the
votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of
the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in
favor. Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under the Bylaws
section 2.3(g), at least the required quorum number must
participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by
voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining. <br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org">Public@cabforum.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>