[cabfpub] Draft Agenda for F2F Taipei Oct. 3-5 for review
Jeremy Rowley
jeremy.rowley at digicert.com
Thu Sep 28 13:59:42 UTC 2017
Thus is on the agenda for the validation working group.
> On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:37 AM, Gervase Markham via Public <public at cabforum.org> wrote:
>
>> On 24/09/17 00:45, Kirk Hall via Public wrote:
>> Please review the draft Agenda below, and offer comments and new topics
>> – as you see, we still have some open time on both days.
>
> I think we should have a discussion about follow-ons to ballot 190. Lots
> of things got pushed off so we could get the validation methods back
> into the document, and may of those improvements added significant
> value. Now the methods are back in there, we should triage all the
> improvement suggestions and get a sense of how controversial each is, so
> we can pass another ballot reasonably quickly with the uncontroversial
> ones, and map out a way forward for the more controversial ones.
>
> Will this happen as part of the Validation WG discussions, or do we need
> a separate slot for it?
>
> Gerv
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
More information about the Public
mailing list