[cabfpub] Reply: Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines

张翼 zhangyi at cfca.com.cn
Wed Oct 18 06:37:49 UTC 2017

CFCA votes Yes on Ballot 207


Zhang Yi


·¢¼þÈË: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] ´ú
±í Bruce Morton via Public
·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2017Äê10ÔÂ17ÈÕ 19:04
ÊÕ¼þÈË: Ben Wilson; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines


Entrust votes Yes to ballot 207.




From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
via Public
Sent: October 9, 2017 10:46 AM
To: CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV


Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines


This ballot clarifies the use of the ASN.1 Jurisdiction of incorporation
field used in EV Certificates.


The following motion has been proposed by Peter Bowen of Amazon and endorsed
by Ben Wilson of DigiCert and Li Chun Chen of Chunghwa Telecom.




In the EV Guidelines, Section 9.2.5 Subject Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Registration Field, under Certificate Fields, STRIKE "ASN.1 -
X520LocalityName as specified in RFC 5280", "ASN.1 - X520StateOrProvinceName
as specified in RFC 5280", and "ASN.1 ¨C X520countryName as specified in RFC
5280" so that "Certificate Fields" reads:


Certificate fields:


Locality (if required):


    subject:jurisdictionLocalityName (OID: 


State or province (if required):


    subject:jurisdictionStateOrProvinceName (OID: 




    subject:jurisdictionCountryName (OID: 


In the EV Guidelines ADD an Appendix G that reads:


Appendix G ¨C Abstract Syntax Notation One module for EV certificates


CABFSelectedAttributeTypes {joint©\iso©\itu©\t(2) international©\
organizations(23) ca©\browser©\forum(140) module(4)
cabfSelectedAttribute-Types(1) 1}










    -- from Rec. ITU-T X.501 | ISO/IEC 9594-2 selectedAttributeTypes, ID,


        FROM UsefulDefinitions {joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1)
usefulDefinitions(0) 7} 

    -- from the X.500 series ub-locality-name, ub-state-name


        FROM UpperBounds {joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1) upperBounds(10) 7}

    -- from Rec. ITU-T X.520 | ISO/IEC 9594-6


    DirectoryString{}, CountryName


        FROM SelectedAttributeTypes selectedAttributeTypes; 


id-evat-jurisdiction ID ::= {ldap-enterprise 311 ev(60) 2 1}


id-evat-jurisdiction-localityName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 1}


id-evat-jurisdiction-stateOrProvinceName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 2}


id-evat-jurisdiction-countryName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 3}


jurisdictionLocalityName ATTRIBUTE ::= {


    SUBTYPE OF name


    WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString{ub-locality-name} LDAP-SYNTAX
directoryString.&id LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionL"} ID
id-evat-jurisdiction-localityName } 


jurisdictionStateOrProvinceName ATTRIBUTE ::= {


    SUBTYPE OF name


    WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString{ub-state-name} LDAP-SYNTAX
directoryString.&id LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionST"} ID
id-evat-jurisdiction-stateOrProvinceName } 


jurisdictionCountryName ATTRIBUTE ::= {


    SUBTYPE OF name


LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionC"} ID id-evat-jurisdiction-countryName } 






The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot is as
follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with applicable
Bylaws and IPR Agreement):


BALLOT 207 Status: Final Maintenance Guideline Start time (22:00 UTC) End
time (22:00 UTC)


Discussion begins October 9, 2017 22:00 UTC and ends October 16, 2017 22:00
UTC (7 days)


Vote for approval begins October 16, 2017 22:00 UTC and ends October 23,
2017 22:00 UTC (7 days)


If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30
days). If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to
be created. If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end
of Review Period. Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair 30 days after filing
of Review Notice by Chair


>From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final
Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison
showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to
become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the
full set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made against the
Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed,
and need not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed
subsequently, except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).


Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public
list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the
response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote
to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear
responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any
representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will
be counted. Voting members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/


In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast
by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by
members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on
CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum
number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by
voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20171018/590089f7/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Public mailing list