[cabfpub] Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines

Devon O'Brien asymmetric at google.com
Fri Oct 20 10:26:32 MST 2017


Google votes YES on Ballot 207.

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Ben Wilson via Public <public at cabforum.org>
wrote:

> *Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines*
>
>
>
> This ballot clarifies the use of the ASN.1 Jurisdiction of incorporation
> field used in EV Certificates.
>
>
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Peter Bowen of Amazon and
> endorsed by Ben Wilson of DigiCert and Li Chun Chen of Chunghwa Telecom.
>
>
>
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
>
>
>
> In the EV Guidelines, Section 9.2.5 Subject Jurisdiction of Incorporation
> or Registration Field, under Certificate Fields, STRIKE "ASN.1 -
> X520LocalityName as specified in RFC 5280", "ASN.1 -
> X520StateOrProvinceName as specified in RFC 5280", and "ASN.1 –
> X520countryName as specified in RFC 5280" so that "Certificate Fields"
> reads:
>
>
>
> Certificate fields:
>
>
>
> Locality (if required):
>
>
>
>     subject:jurisdictionLocalityName (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.1)
>
>
>
> State or province (if required):
>
>
>
>     subject:jurisdictionStateOrProvinceName (OID:
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.2)
>
>
>
> Country:
>
>
>
>     subject:jurisdictionCountryName (OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.3)
>
>
>
> In the EV Guidelines ADD an Appendix G that reads:
>
>
>
> Appendix G – Abstract Syntax Notation One module for EV certificates
>
>
>
> CABFSelectedAttributeTypes {joint‐iso‐itu‐t(2) international‐organizations(23)
> ca‐browser‐forum(140) module(4) cabfSelectedAttribute-Types(1) 1}
>
>
>
> DEFINITIONS ::=
>
>
>
> BEGIN
>
>
>
> -- EXPORTS All
>
>
>
> IMPORTS
>
>
>
>     -- from Rec. ITU-T X.501 | ISO/IEC 9594-2 selectedAttributeTypes, ID,
> ldap-enterprise
>
>
>
>         FROM UsefulDefinitions {joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1)
> usefulDefinitions(0) 7}
>
>     -- from the X.500 series ub-locality-name, ub-state-name
>
>
>
>         FROM UpperBounds {joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1) upperBounds(10)
> 7}
>
>     -- from Rec. ITU-T X.520 | ISO/IEC 9594-6
>
>
>
>     DirectoryString{}, CountryName
>
>
>
>         FROM SelectedAttributeTypes selectedAttributeTypes;
>
>
>
> id-evat-jurisdiction ID ::= {ldap-enterprise 311 ev(60) 2 1}
>
>
>
> id-evat-jurisdiction-localityName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 1}
>
>
>
> id-evat-jurisdiction-stateOrProvinceName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 2}
>
>
>
> id-evat-jurisdiction-countryName ID ::= {id-evat-jurisdiction 3}
>
>
>
> jurisdictionLocalityName ATTRIBUTE ::= {
>
>
>
>     SUBTYPE OF name
>
>
>
>     WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString{ub-locality-name} LDAP-SYNTAX
> directoryString.&id LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionL"} ID id-evat-jurisdiction-localityName
> }
>
>
>
> jurisdictionStateOrProvinceName ATTRIBUTE ::= {
>
>
>
>     SUBTYPE OF name
>
>
>
>     WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString{ub-state-name} LDAP-SYNTAX
> directoryString.&id LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionST"} ID id-evat-jurisdiction-stateOrProvinceName
> }
>
>
>
> jurisdictionCountryName ATTRIBUTE ::= {
>
>
>
>     SUBTYPE OF name
>
>
>
>     WITH SYNTAX CountryName SINGLE VALUE TRUE LDAP-SYNTAX
> countryString.&id LDAP-NAME {"jurisdictionC"} ID id-evat-jurisdiction-countryName
> }
>
>
>
> END
>
>
>
> -- MOTION ENDS --
>
>
>
> The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot is
> as follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with
> applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
>
>
>
> BALLOT 207 Status: Final Maintenance Guideline Start time (22:00 UTC) End
> time (22:00 UTC)
>
>
>
> Discussion begins October 9, 2017 22:00 UTC and ends October 16, 2017
> 22:00 UTC (7 days)
>
>
>
> Vote for approval begins October 16, 2017 22:00 UTC and ends October 23,
> 2017 22:00 UTC (7 days)
>
>
>
> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30
> days). If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG
> to be created. If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at
> end of Review Period. Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair 30 days after
> filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
>
>
> From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final
> Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison
> showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to
> become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the
> full set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made against
> the Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is
> proposed, and need not take into consideration other ballots that may be
> proposed subsequently, except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).
>
>
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the
> Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in
> the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A
> vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear
> responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any
> representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period
> will be counted. Voting members are listed here:
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
>
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes
> cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast
> by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on
> CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum
> number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by
> voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20171020/eb554bff/attachment.html>


More information about the Public mailing list