[cabfpub] New RFC on CT Domain Label Redaction

Mike Reilly (WDG) Mike.Reilly at microsoft.com
Tue Nov 21 20:46:09 UTC 2017

Thanks Gerv.  I think this will be helpful as we have been going through both internal and one off conversations with others on this topic.   Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 7:04 AM
To: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] New RFC on CT Domain Label Redaction

On 03/11/17 23:23, Kirk Hall via Public wrote:
> This email is to lay out the course we want to follow to complete the 
> technical specs for Redaction in the IETF, and also to address the 
> recourse issues and consider appropriate changes to the Forum’s 
> Baseline Requirements in response.

In order to try and bring some light to this discussion, I have attempted to summarise the arguments for and against CT redaction here:

I can only extract data from recently-posted messages and IDs, so the document is clearly incomplete. If you have an additional consideration to add, or a response to an existing one, or want to improve the text, feel free - it's a wiki. If you are unable or unwilling to get a login (they do need approving, but it doesn't normally take long) then you can send edits to me, although I reserve the right to edit your edits ;-)

Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org

More information about the Public mailing list