[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Send us you list of current problems with the Network Security Guidelines

[Ryan Sleevi]

Hi Kirk,

While I realize your reply was seeking for more clarification, I think it's
important to note that you didn't actually engage with the question I
asked. I'm hoping to ask again - could you go into detail why this would be
beneficial for discussion?

Thanks

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
wrote:

> Why do you think it’s detrimental to discussion – I don’t follow your
> logic?
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 9, 2017 4:49 PM
> *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
> *Cc:* Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Send us you list of current problems
> with the Network Security Guidelines
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <public at cabforum.org>
> wrote:
>
> Bruce and I will combine all suggestions received and report *anonymously*
> to the whole group for a discussion in Berlin.
>
>
>
> That seems pretty detrimental to discussion - that is, the anonymous
> aspect - unless we're talking about specific audit failures.
>
>
>
> Could you go into detail why this would be beneficial for discussion?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170611/b3a41035/attachment-0003.html>