[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Send us you list of current problems with the Network Security Guidelines
Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com
Sat Jun 10 04:54:58 UTC 2017
Why do you think it’s detrimental to discussion – I don’t follow your logic?
From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:49 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Send us you list of current problems with the Network Security Guidelines
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>> wrote:
Bruce and I will combine all suggestions received and report anonymously to the whole group for a discussion in Berlin.
That seems pretty detrimental to discussion - that is, the anonymous aspect - unless we're talking about specific audit failures.
Could you go into detail why this would be beneficial for discussion?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Public