[cabfpub] Ballot 203: Formation of Network Security Working Group

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Mon Jun 5 20:28:12 UTC 2017

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:

> On 05/06/17 21:11, Peter Bowen wrote:
> > What is the value of having a WG established by the F2F.  The F2F can
> discuss the topic all it wants with or without a WG charter.
> Well, it can, but the chances are that we'll end up with a rerun of the
> last discussion at the previous F2F, where we all agree that there's a
> problem and the next thing to do is to charter a working group.
> If we actually have a working group, we can gather expressions of
> interest, perhaps even choose a chair, and the interested parties can
> start defining a direction that their work will take them in.

I'm not sure I understand this. How does a WG promote that - since you
could just as well accomplish the same in the F2F.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170605/cd7bddc4/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list