[cabfpub] PAG - updated PAG member list for Tuesday teleconference
Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com
Mon Jan 23 18:36:23 MST 2017
Maybe this is an academic issue, but if someone accepts the calendar invitation to the calls of the PAG “Group”, to me that means they have volunteered to serve on the PAG. There will be work involved.
We will take PAG Minutes, which will list who shows up for each PAG call. I suppose if someone wants to drop off the PAG list as a member after accepting the calendar invitation, the best thing would be to send an email.
What I’d like to avoid is having CABF members be on the calls, talking and participating, but then saying they are not serving as PAG members – the IPR Policy talks about the PAG as a “Group”, so I think we need to define who is a member of the Group, versus simply a CABF member.
From: Peter Bowen [mailto:pzb at amzn.com]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 5:29 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Kirk Hall <Kirk.Hall at entrustdatacard.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] PAG - updated PAG member list for Tuesday teleconference
I presume this list will be trimmed if people do not join the calls, correct? Just accepting the invite does not make one a member, I would think.
On Jan 23, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>> wrote:
Here is an updated list of Member representatives who accepted the recurring invitation to the Patent Advisory Group (PAG) teleconference, starting tomorrow (Tuesday) at 17:00 UTC. Dial in information is contained in the invitation.
Other Member representatives may join the teleconference – but anyone on the teleconference will be listed as a PAG member.
Not eligible for Chair
Li-Chun Chen 陳立群
Pin-Jung Chiang 江彬榮
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org<mailto:Public at cabforum.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Public