[cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6

[Ryan Sleevi]

Yeah, those should be done by ballot, just to make sure everyone
understands the implications and interpretation :)

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Jeremy Rowley via Public <
public at cabforum.org> wrote:

> At least one of those is part of ballot 190
>
>
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Dimitris
> Zacharopoulos via Public
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 29, 2017 1:22 PM
> *To:* public at cabforum.org
> *Cc:* Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr>
> *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6
>
>
>
> Ben,
>
> At some point we should also fix the incorrect references pointing to
> Section 3.3.1 instead of 4.2.1, that have been identified in Sections
> 3.2.2.4 and 4.1.2.
>
>
> Dimitris.
>
> On 29/4/2017 12:34 πμ, Ben Wilson via Public wrote:
>
> All versions are now posted here - https://cabforum.org/baseline-
> requirements-documents/
>
> I will upload them to the wiki and update the GitHub version.
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org
> <public-bounces at cabforum.org>] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson via Public
> *Sent:* Friday, April 28, 2017 1:51 PM
> *To:* CABFPub <public at cabforum.org> <public at cabforum.org>
> *Cc:* Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com> <ben.wilson at digicert.com>
> *Subject:* [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> I am in the process of updating the web page for the  Baseline
> Requirements and creating a version 1.4.7 of the Baseline Requirements
> based on adoption of Ballot 196 - Define "Audit Period".  In that process,
> I compared version 1.4.6 on GitHub with a Word version (which I’ve used in
> the past to create the PDFs that we post on cabforum.org), and I noticed
> some minor discrepancies.
>
>
>
> Until we abandon one version over the other (and maybe we’re at that
> point), it is important to ensure consistency between GitHub and Word.  I
> made changes to both the GitHub version (see https://github.com/cabforum/
> documents/pull/54/commits/5033553107cad20ac26b8c185b6006463f8df013) and
> the Word version (redlined version attached as PDF) to make them more
> consistent.  My belief is that with these edits that they are now
> consistent (except for instances where section headings have been
> capitalized in one version or the other), and that they reflect the current
> state of the Baseline Requirements (as of Ballot 195 – CAA Fixup, provided
> that no exclusion notices are filed during the IPR review period).
>
>
>
> Before I proceed with creating a version 1.4.7 of the BRs, I thought I’d
> give anyone a chance to object, correct me where I’m wrong, etc.  Please
> review.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ben
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Public mailing list
>
> Public at cabforum.org
>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170430/8ce21cf0/attachment-0003.html>