[cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6

Jeremy Rowley jeremy.rowley at digicert.com
Sun Apr 30 17:12:03 UTC 2017

At least one of those is part of ballot 190


From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 1:22 PM
To: public at cabforum.org
Cc: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6



At some point we should also fix the incorrect references pointing to Section 3.3.1 instead of 4.2.1, that have been identified in Sections and 4.1.2. 


On 29/4/2017 12:34 πμ, Ben Wilson via Public wrote:

All versions are now posted here - https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/ 

I will upload them to the wiki and update the GitHub version.

From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 1:51 PM
To: CABFPub  <mailto:public at cabforum.org> <public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Ben Wilson  <mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com> <ben.wilson at digicert.com>
Subject: [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6




I am in the process of updating the web page for the  Baseline Requirements and creating a version 1.4.7 of the Baseline Requirements based on adoption of Ballot 196 - Define "Audit Period".  In that process, I compared version 1.4.6 on GitHub with a Word version (which I’ve used in the past to create the PDFs that we post on cabforum.org), and I noticed some minor discrepancies.  


Until we abandon one version over the other (and maybe we’re at that point), it is important to ensure consistency between GitHub and Word.  I made changes to both the GitHub version (see https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/54/commits/5033553107cad20ac26b8c185b6006463f8df013) and the Word version (redlined version attached as PDF) to make them more consistent.  My belief is that with these edits that they are now consistent (except for instances where section headings have been capitalized in one version or the other), and that they reflect the current state of the Baseline Requirements (as of Ballot 195 – CAA Fixup, provided that no exclusion notices are filed during the IPR review period). 


Before I proceed with creating a version 1.4.7 of the BRs, I thought I’d give anyone a chance to object, correct me where I’m wrong, etc.  Please review.





Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org <mailto:Public at cabforum.org> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170430/49859c6d/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4964 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170430/49859c6d/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list