[cabfpub] RFC 3647 Compliance

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Wed Apr 26 02:11:40 UTC 2017

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 5:00 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <public at cabforum.org>
> wrote:
> Like we talked about at the recent F2F in Raleigh, I'd love to see a world
> where we can slowly move to consistent CP/CPSes. This is especially
> important for efforts like the CCADB with Microsoft's help, or the BR
> self-assessments that Mozilla's requesting.
> You can see the initial proposed edits at https://github.com/sleevi/
> cabforum-docs/pull/3/files , along with explanations for the motivations
> for these.
> Am I correct that you are using “MUST be structured in accordance with
> RFC 3647” as short hand for “MUST include all the section headings
> specified in the outline in RFC 3647 section 6”?  Should it say that
> sections without subordinate headings and without content need to specify
> “No stipulation” or is that too specific?

That's a great point. Certainly, the intent is that all the section
headings are present, in the same order and with the prescribed
content/topic of discussion.

I'd love to hear from others, but I actually think "No stipulation" is a
useful and valuable addition.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170425/27aa9b27/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list