[cabfpub] RFC 3647 Compliance

Peter Bowen pzb at amzn.com
Wed Apr 26 01:35:43 UTC 2017

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 5:00 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <public at cabforum.org> wrote:
> Like we talked about at the recent F2F in Raleigh, I'd love to see a world where we can slowly move to consistent CP/CPSes. This is especially important for efforts like the CCADB with Microsoft's help, or the BR self-assessments that Mozilla's requesting.
> You can see the initial proposed edits at https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/3/files <https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/3/files> , along with explanations for the motivations for these.

Am I correct that you are using “MUST be structured in accordance with RFC 3647” as short hand for “MUST include all the section headings specified in the outline in RFC 3647 section 6”?  Should it say that sections without subordinate headings and without content need to specify “No stipulation” or is that too specific?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170425/8aa257bb/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list