[cabfpub] Immense Organization Legal Names in EV certificates
Kirk Hall
Kirk.Hall at entrust.com
Sat Sep 24 04:51:52 UTC 2016
Perhaps this?
At 80 letters, the longest word ever composed in German is Donaudampfschifffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft, the "Association for Subordinate Officials of the Head Office Management of the Danube Steamboat Electrical Services".
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Rick Andrews
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:38 PM
To: Rich Smith <richard.smith at comodo.com>; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Immense Organization Legal Names in EV certificates
Rich, the current case is from Germany but I don't think they're all from Germany.
-Rick
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Rich Smith
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 3:28 PM
To: public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Immense Organization Legal Names in EV certificates
Rick,
Is it Germany where you are running into this by chance? It seems I've seen similar though I don't think to the extreme of 200 characters (yet). Thus far I've generally been able to abbreviate down to 64, but that's probably mostly luck. Given some of the names I've had to deal with, I can see it being a problem if they got even one word longer. I'm in agreement with you, so am also interested to see what others, especially those in Germany and other areas with similar naming conventions, might think.
-Rich
On 9/23/2016 3:47 PM, Rick Andrews wrote:
Based on the last paragraph at EVG 9.2.1, I have a question about
non-material words in legal names that are impossible to fully capture in
any abbreviated form. We encounter legal names in excess of 200 characters.
In one general case, a portion of the name clearly marks the publicly known
part of the name and a portion of the name refers to a geographic
association to which the organization belongs but this is recorded in the
organization's full legal name.
A literal example (made up): Symantec Corporation, a Certificate Authority
that is a Member of the CA/Browser Forum and Operates in the US, UK, EMEA,
and Asia Pacific Regions. I would propose that Symantec Corporation is
material and the rest is not because it does not identify a more specific
legal entity than Symantec Corporation. Therefore, non-material content
removed, the Organization attribute could contain Symantec Corporation.
Another: ABC Company, a licensed public accountancy practicing in the states
of New York, California, Delaware, and Nevada. That would be ABC Company.
The specific organizations subject to this situation are intentionally
abstracted by examples. Does anyone disagree with what's material and
non-material in these examples?
-Rick
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org<mailto:Public at cabforum.org>
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160924/1eabeb4d/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Public
mailing list