[cabfpub] Ballot proposal for Issuance Date

[Ryan Sleevi]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>
wrote:

> Sorry - jumped to conclusions early on when I saw the title...
>
> Doesn't that make the cert bigger? Seems like a better solution to simply
> include an issuance time rather than another signed data structure.
> Companies already complain about cert size all the time.


Companies complain about _unnecessary_ cert size all the time (e.g.
unnecessary CPS statements).

This has clear value for the ecosystem. And the cost is only borne in the
backdating case.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160922/f534e49e/attachment-0003.html>