[cabfpub] Notice of Certificate Issuance

[Dean Coclin]

All questions acknowledged. I am pulling responses together and will advise
soon.

Thanks
Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase
Markham via Public
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:40 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Notice of Certificate Issuance

On 30/11/16 00:31, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
> I have a few questions related to this - both related to the specific 
> instance, but also the general question of what can we, as the Forum, 
> do better.

These are all excellent questions.

> 3) Symantec is 'notable' for its continued attempts to view 
> misissuance as exceptional. This is true regarding SHA-1 sunsetting 
> (and the subsequent exception process developed), it's true in this 
> case, and it's true in past instances as well (such as Pitney Bowes
> - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966350 ). 

Hmm. I note that Rick never responded to my question there about why this
cert had a "BR compliant" OID inserted...

Gerv
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5723 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20161130/0ab01acd/attachment-0001.p7s>