[cabfpub] IPR policy and authorial intent

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Tue Nov 8 18:10:23 UTC 2016

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Gervase Markham via Public <
public at cabforum.org> wrote:

> and I think the general risks of
> IPR "fishing" Ryan raises would not come into play because we would only
> be using this process for a limited time and a known number of ballots
> with known content.

Can you point me to the ballot or bylaw that guarantees this? Otherwise,
you're taking a gamble that everyone will behave rationally - which, from a
legal perspective, is like playing Russian Roulette with 6 bullets in the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20161108/e5ad1d6c/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list