[cabfpub] Code Signing Working Group
jeremy.rowley at digicert.com
Fri May 6 13:39:19 MST 2016
Why is it wrong? That's what I don't get. Aren't all documents we create
intended for the use of particular companies and programs?
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv at mozilla.org]
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 2:18 PM
To: Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>; Dean Coclin
<Dean_Coclin at symantec.com>
Cc: CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Code Signing Working Group
More later perhaps but:
On 06/05/16 21:10, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> Neither of these changes should have any effect on what people want to
> put in the document or use it for. Or, for that matter, whether they
> can talk about it in Bilbao.
> [JR] Doesn't it? Seems like that's exactly the intent.
I thought I was very clear: I have no objection (subject to the permission of
the person who rents the room, which I'm sure you'd get) for the same people
to meet to discuss the same things at the same time they would have met
otherwise, and I have no views on what they can talk about or what documents
they can edit. I might even be there myself. My proposals have bent over
backwards to avoid inconveniencing anyone by this formal change of status.
But I think it's wrong for work to continue _under_the_CAB_Forum_banner_ on a
document _which_retains_a_CAB_Forum_label_ but which has no prospect of
becoming an official work product of the Forum, and which is instead being
edited for the use of particular companies and programs which are not the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4964 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160506/1900bf2e/attachment.bin
More information about the Public